On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:03 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> My guess is that the FILLFACTOR will actually be a GUC variable rather
> >> than a clause to CREATE INDEX or REINDEX or CLUSTER.
>
> > I hop
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 11:51:33AM +0530, Dinesh Pandey wrote:
> I am trying to apply "sqlstate.diff" patch for SQLERRM and SQLSTATE for
> plpgsql.
>
> 1. I have copied "sqlstate.diff" in "postgresql-8.0.1/src/pl/plpgsql/src"
> directory.
> 2. Executing command:
> patch -p4 < sqlstate.diff
Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:03 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> My guess is that the FILLFACTOR will actually be a GUC variable rather
> >> than a clause to CREATE INDEX or REINDEX or CLUSTER.
>
> > I hope not, but it would be easier to se
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:03 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> My guess is that the FILLFACTOR will actually be a GUC variable rather
>> than a clause to CREATE INDEX or REINDEX or CLUSTER.
> I hope not, but it would be easier to set like that and a lot easier
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:03 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> My guess is that the FILLFACTOR will actually be a GUC variable rather
> than a clause to CREATE INDEX or REINDEX or CLUSTER.
I hope not, but it would be easier to set like that and a lot easier to
code up that way.
Trouble is, if you need
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 02:08 +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > Anyway, when I get time, I'll finish off the patch. Unless other readers
> > would like to follow on.
>
> I hope you will you will get that time before 8.1 ships :)
It's very unlikely, sorry.
I'm working towards improving Business Intel
My guess is that the FILLFACTOR will actually be a GUC variable rather
than a clause to CREATE INDEX or REINDEX or CLUSTER.
---
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> On T, 2005-04-12 at 18:38 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-04-1
On T, 2005-04-12 at 18:38 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 09:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
(Neil, I added you to CC: to show you at least two more places where
sparse heaps can be generally useful and not tweaks for single
benchmark)
> > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 19:44 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Main issue is the need to poke the xlog record pointer with a new value
> after the log switch. I'm a little uncertain about that approach and I'm
> very likely getting it wrong now. Better ideas welcome.
Happier with that approach now. Worki
