Re: [PATCHES] Multiple -t options for pg_dump

2005-09-23 Thread Neil Conway
On Fri, 2005-23-09 at 00:14 -0700, David Fetter wrote: Yes. Please find enclosed round 2 of the patch. It implements multiple -n's and multiple -t's, although I think it's broken for multiple -n's with no -t's. BTW, have you read the (extensive) prior discussion of this topic? For example,

Re: [PATCHES] Free WAL caches on switching segments

2005-09-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is a small patch to prevent undesired WAL file caching by kernel. posix_fadvise(POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED) attempts to free cached pages and the kernel will discard them in preference to other data caches. On plenty of

Re: [PATCHES] be-secure.c patch

2005-09-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
This has been saved for the 8.2 release: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold --- Libor Hoho? wrote: Hello PG folks, the attachement contains a simple patch to adding of verification of

Re: [PATCHES] PL/Python error checking

2005-09-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Michael Fuhr wrote: On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 08:13:24PM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 12:58:24AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: I am unclear about backpatching this. We have to weigh the risks of applying or not applying to 8.0.X. Comments? Since 7.4, PL/Python is

Re: [PATCHES] PL/Python error checking

2005-09-23 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 05:03:02PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: Michael Fuhr wrote: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-06/msg00519.php I have backpatched this to 8.0.X. It did not apply cleanly to 7.4.X so if you would like that version patched please submit a matching patch.

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Improved \df(+) in psql + backward-compatibility

2005-09-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Seems this item will have to remain for 8.2. I have added this to TODO: o Display IN, INOUT, and OUT parameters in \df+ It probably requires psql to output newlines in the proper column, which is already on the TODO list.