Hi,
This version updates the patch to CVS HEAD and has various fixes and
refactoring, including proper docs. I refactored get_opclass_name() into
lsyscache.c, but then realized that this means that lsyscache.c will
depend on commands/indexcmds.c (for GetDefaultOpClass()), which is
arguably
Tom Lane wrote:
What you would hope to see as the benefit of the patch is that the time
for the range SELECT degrades more slowly as more of the table is
replaced. Ignoring the first SELECT as being a startup transient, it
looks like HEAD degrades from about 3 msec to 6 msec over 10 iterations
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* delete a random 2% of the table
* vacuum to recover space
* insert a random 2% of the table
* select (about) 1000 consecutively-numbered rows
* select all the rows (this is just a cross check that the
number of rows
Gregory Stark wrote:
It's pretty serious what you're suggesting since it means that we'll basically
never have a real cluster feature. I would sure hope we're missing something
and there's a way to make this work usefully.
Another approach would be an online CLUSTER command. That means
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
The hardware is just a Dell x86_64 workstation with crappy IDE disk, so
maybe things would look better elsewhere, but it's all I have to work
with.
Do you have write-caching turned off on the drive so INSERTs are being
rate-limited by WAL syncs? Trying
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's pretty serious what you're suggesting since it means that we'll
basically never have a real cluster feature.
It seems entirely likely that this is not the way to go about real
clustering.
regards, tom lane
Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
The hardware is just a Dell x86_64 workstation with crappy IDE disk, so
maybe things would look better elsewhere, but it's all I have to work
with.
Do you have write-caching turned off on the drive so INSERTs are
Neil Conway wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-06 at 14:50 +0530, NikhilS wrote:
PFA, a patch which provides the CREATE .. INCLUDING INDEXES
functionality. This patch uses the same functionality introduced by
the earlier patches in this thread albeit for the INCLUDING INDEXES
case.
Attached is a
On 7/10/07, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neil Conway wrote:
Attached is a revised version of this patch. Sorry for taking so long to
make progress on this: my new job been keeping my busy, and I've
recently been ill.
Illness only counts as an excuse if you _don't_ recover. If you
