On 5/9/07, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2007 02:21 schrieb Jaime Casanova:
> > What I have been missing all along in these patches is an explanation for
> > what it means to list multiple temporary tablespaces. Are they used in
> > order, or the first one that
Am Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2007 02:21 schrieb Jaime Casanova:
> > What I have been missing all along in these patches is an explanation for
> > what it means to list multiple temporary tablespaces. Are they used in
> > order, or the first one that exists, or what?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql
On 5/8/07, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Samstag, 5. Mai 2007 16:40 schrieb Jaime Casanova:
> On 5/5/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
>
> This is final version of the patch (i hope), at least i
Am Samstag, 5. Mai 2007 16:40 schrieb Jaime Casanova:
> On 5/5/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
>
> This is final version of the patch (i hope), at least it fixes the
> problem i had yesterday.
What I have been
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Ja
On 5/5/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
This is final version of the patch (i hope), at least it fixes the
problem i had yesterday.
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
"Programming today is a race between software engi
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Ja
On 5/3/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
This is an updated version of the patch.
Tom objections:
- fd.c is too low level for calling code from commands/tablespace.c.
This was fixed adding a second parameter t
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Ja
On 3/17/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Jaime Casanova" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 3/5/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In the second place, it's a serious violation of what little modularity
>> and layering we have for fd.c to be calling into commands/tablespace.c.
>> Th
10 matches
Mail list logo