On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 19:40 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
not sure what the problem is?
Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 03:08:08PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 19:40 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
not
Simon Riggs wrote:
I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
not sure what the problem is?
Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00
What an obvious ploy to get more time
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Plaintext patch, plus two plaintext .c files.
Then I have no clue.
Actually I've had more success with .tar.gz than plain text attachments.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
---(end of
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
not sure what the problem is?
Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00
What an obvious
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Plaintext patch, plus two plaintext .c files.
Then I have no clue.
Actually I've had more success with .tar.gz than plain text attachments.
I think the filter is not on the name or actual contents of the
Dave Page wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
not sure what the problem is?
Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
Sent: 1 Apr 12:11
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
not sure what the problem is?
Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
Sent: 1
Tom Lane wrote:
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Plaintext patch, plus two plaintext .c files.
Then I have no clue.
Actually I've had more success with .tar.gz than plain text attachments.
I think the filter is not on the name or actual
Dave Page wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
not sure what the problem is?
Sent: 31
I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
not sure what the problem is?
Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB
Simon Riggs wrote:
I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
not sure what the problem is?
Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00
Did you by any chance send it in .tar.gz
12 matches
Mail list logo