On Mon, 2021-10-11 at 00:09 +0200, Franck Pachot wrote:
> And people will dislike it because it mentions Oracle.
I don't think so.
While "Oracle has it" is not a good enough reason for a feature, it
is certainly no counter-indication.
> Or people will dislike it because they think this should be
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 11:06 PM Jeff Holt wrote:
> TLDR; If I spend the time necessary to instrument the many functions that
> are the equivalent of the Oracle counterparts, would anyone pull those
> changes and use them? Specifically, for those who know Oracle, I'm talking
> about implementing:
