On 03/30/2011 06:54 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Lars Feistnerfeist...@uni-heidelberg.de wrote:
On 03/29/2011 09:28 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Lars Feistnerfeist...@uni-heidelberg.de wrote:
The log tells me that certain update statements take sometimes
about 3-10 minutes. But we are talking
Dear all,
I have a Postgres database server with 16GB RAM.
Our application runs by making connections to Postgres Server from
different servers and selecting data from one table insert into
remaining tables in a database.
Below is the no. of connections output :-
postgres=# select
max_connections = 700
shared_buffers = 4096MB
temp_buffers = 16MB
work_mem = 64MB
maintenance_work_mem = 128MB
wal_buffers = 32MB
checkpoint_segments = 32
random_page_cost = 2.0
effective_cache_size = 4096MB
First of all, there's no reason to increase wal_buffers above 32MB. AFAIK
the
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Adarsh Sharma adarsh.sha...@orkash.com wrote:
Dear all,
I have a Postgres database server with 16GB RAM.
Our application runs by making connections to Postgres Server from different
servers and selecting data from one table insert into remaining tables in
a
Also you can try to take the help of pgtune before hand.
pgfoundry.org/projects/*pgtune*/
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Adarsh Sharma adarsh.sha...@orkash.com
wrote:
Dear all,
I have a Postgres database
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com wrote:
[root@s8-mysd-2 ~]# free total used free shared
buffers cached
Mem: 16299476 16202264 97212 0 58924 15231852
-/+ buffers/cache: 911488 15387988
Adarsh,
What is the Size of Database?
Best Regards,
Raghavendra
EnterpriseDB Corporation
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Scott Marlowe scott.marl...@gmail.com
wrote:
[root@s8-mysd-2 ~]# free total
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Adarsh Sharma adarsh.sha...@orkash.com wrote:
Mem: 16299476k total, 16198784k used, 100692k free, 73776k buffers
Swap: 16787884k total, 148176k used, 16639708k free, 15585396k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+
COMMAND
Thanks Scott :
My iostat package is not installed but have a look on below output:
[root@s8-mysd-2 8.4SS]# vmstat 10
procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io --system--
-cpu--
r b swpd free buff cache si sobibo incs us sy
id wa st
1 0 147664
You got to have something to compare against.
I would say, try to run some benchmarks (pgbench from contrib) and compare them
against a known good instance of postgresql, if you have access in such a
machine.
That said, and forgive me if i sound a little explicit but if you dont know
how to
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Adarsh Sharma adarsh.sha...@orkash.com wrote:
Thanks Scott :
My iostat package is not installed but have a look on below output:
[root@s8-mysd-2 8.4SS]# vmstat 10
procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io --system--
-cpu--
r b
Thanks Scott :
My iostat package is not installed but have a look on below output:
[root@s8-mysd-2 8.4SS]# vmstat 10
procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io --system--
-cpu--
r b swpd free buff cache si sobibo incs us sy
id wa st
1 0
Thank U all,
I know some things to work on after some work study on them , I will
continue this discussion tomorrow .
Best Regards,
Adarsh
Raghavendra wrote:
Adarsh,
[root@s8-mysd-2 8.4SS]# iostat
-bash: iostat: command not found
/usr/bin/iostat
Our application runs
Adarsh,
[root@s8-mysd-2 8.4SS]# iostat
-bash: iostat: command not found
/usr/bin/iostat
Our application runs by making connections to Postgres Server from different
servers and selecting data from one table insert into remaining tables in
a database.
When you are doing bulk inserts you
Lars Feistner feist...@uni-heidelberg.de wrote:
On 03/30/2011 06:54 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
If you haven't already done so, you should probably turn on
checkpoint logging to see if this corresponds to checkpoint
activity. If it does, you can try cranking up how aggressive
your background
On 03/28/2011 04:21 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
Today is the launch of Intel's 3rd generation SSD line, the 320
series. And they've finally produced a cheap consumer product that
may be useful for databases, too! They've put 6 small capacitors onto
the board and added logic to flush the write
16 matches
Mail list logo