On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:23 PM, David Boreham david_l...@boreham.orgwrote:
A few quick thoughts:
1. 320 would be the only SSD I'd trust from your short-list. It's the only
one with proper protection from unexpected power loss.
2. Multiple RAID'ed SSDs sounds like (vast) overkill for your
On 10/28/2011 12:40 AM, Amitabh Kant wrote:
Sadly, 710 is not that easily available around here at the moment.
All three sizes are in stock at newegg.com, if you have a way to export
from the US to your location.
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list
Am 24.10.2011 16:09, schrieb Amitabh Kant:
while Intel 320 had a nasty bug which has been rectified
Be careful with that Intel SSD.
This one is still very buggy.
Take a look at the Intel forums
http://communities.intel.com/community/tech/solidstate?view=discussions#/ about
users who are
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:37 PM, David Boreham david_l...@boreham.org wrote:
What about redundancy?
How do you swap an about-to-die SSD?
Software RAID-1?
The approach we take is that we use 710 series devices which have predicted
reliability similar to all the other components in the
On 10/25/2011 8:55 AM, Claudio Freire wrote:
But what about unexpected failures. Faulty electronics, stuff like
that? I really don't think a production server can work without at
least raid-1.
Same approach : a server either works or it does not. The transition
between working and not
Hello
I need to choose between Intel 320 , Intel 510 and OCZ Vertex 3 SSD's for my
database server. From recent reading in the list and other places, I have
come to understand that OCZ Vertex 3 should not be used, Intel 510 uses a
Marvel controller while Intel 320 had a nasty bug which has been
A few quick thoughts:
1. 320 would be the only SSD I'd trust from your short-list. It's the
only one with proper protection from unexpected power loss.
2. Multiple RAID'ed SSDs sounds like (vast) overkill for your workload.
A single SSD should be sufficient (will get you several thousand TPS
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:53 AM, David Boreham david_l...@boreham.org wrote:
A few quick thoughts:
1. 320 would be the only SSD I'd trust from your short-list. It's the only
one with proper protection from unexpected power loss.
yeah.
2. Multiple RAID'ed SSDs sounds like (vast) overkill
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com wrote:
2. Multiple RAID'ed SSDs sounds like (vast) overkill for your workload. A
single SSD should be sufficient (will get you several thousand TPS on
pgbench for your DB size).
Also, raid controllers interfere with TRIM.
On 10/24/2011 3:31 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
4. Consider using Intel 710 series rather than 320 (pay for them with the
money saved from #3 above). Those devices have much, much higher specified
endurance than the 320s and since your DB is quite small you only need to
buy one of them.
710
On 10/24/2011 4:47 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
What about redundancy?
How do you swap an about-to-die SSD?
Software RAID-1?
The approach we take is that we use 710 series devices which have
predicted reliability similar to all the other components in the
machine, therefore the unit of
11 matches
Mail list logo
