Dear Friends,
Postgres 7.3.2.
I have an database with owner USRA who owns about
300 objects (tables and functions). Now I want to give 'ALL' permission to all
the objects of USRA to another database user USRB.
If I use the grant i need to type all the objects
as comma separated, like the
I've stumbled across a query I don't quite understand the error message
for.
This query is pulled from a working MySQL setup:
SELECT
DEWEY_ID, DEWEY_HUNDREDS, DEWEY_TENS, DEWEY_ONES, DEWEY_POINT_ONES,
DEWEY_POINT_TENS,
DEWEY_POINT_HUNDREDS, DEWEY_POINT_THOUSANDS, DEWEY_TYPE, DEWEY_LANG,
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 11:25:59AM +0100, Dan Field wrote:
I've stumbled across a query I don't quite understand the error message
for.
This query is pulled from a working MySQL setup:
SELECT
DEWEY_ID, DEWEY_HUNDREDS, DEWEY_TENS, DEWEY_ONES, DEWEY_POINT_ONES,
DEWEY_POINT_TENS,
On 15/04/2004 11:25 Dan Field wrote:
I've stumbled across a query I don't quite understand the error message
for.
This query is pulled from a working MySQL setup:
SELECT
DEWEY_ID, DEWEY_HUNDREDS, DEWEY_TENS, DEWEY_ONES,
DEWEY_POINT_ONES, DEWEY_POINT_TENS, DEWEY_POINT_HUNDREDS,
El Jue 15 Abr 2004 07:25, Dan Field escribió:
I've stumbled across a query I don't quite understand the error message
for.
This query is pulled from a working MySQL setup:
SELECT
DEWEY_ID, DEWEY_HUNDREDS, DEWEY_TENS, DEWEY_ONES, DEWEY_POINT_ONES,
DEWEY_POINT_TENS,
Tom Lane writes:
Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am trying to return an array from a function and don't seem to be having
luck.
Seems to work for me ... what PG version are you using?
pg 7.4.1
I should have listed the source for the function. Here is a simplified
parseString function and the
Just FYI, recent versions of PG use cursors internally for PL/pgSQL FOR
loops. So there is no danger for a procedure to run out of memory when
looping over a huge result set ... at least not because of that.
Jan
Dennis wrote:
Tom Lane writes:
Something like
LOOP
Dear SQL and plPgSQL gurus, I seek for your wisdom.
I have a variable assignment via SELECT INTO in my function, and I want
to separate 3 cases:
1) no rows found;
2) one row found;
3) many rows found (ambiguous select).
The first case is simple, I use FOUND variable for it.
But how
Dear Friends,
Postgres 7.3.2.
I have an database with owner USRA who owns about 300 objects (tables and f=
unctions). Now I want to give 'ALL' permission to all the objects of USRA t=
o another database user USRB.
If I use the grant i need to type all the objects as comma separated,
Dennis wrote:
pg 7.4.1
I should have listed the source for the function. Here is a simplified
parseString function and the foo that calls it.
dennis=# create or replace function parseString (varchar, varchar)
dennis-# RETURNS varchar[] AS '
dennis'# DECLARE
dennis'#
Joe Conway writes:
dennis'# pParsed varchar[];
Make that last line:
pParsed varchar[] := ''{}'';
That initializes pParsed to an *empty* array. Otherwise pParsed is NULL,
and when you attempt to extend a NULL array, e.g. pParsed[1] =
hi,
i'm running an update procedure on a table with approximately 100,000
records. The problem is the procedure is running endlessly even when the
update is very simple like in the following example:
update mytable
set client_id = 1
where mytable_id = 1
mytable_id is the primary key of mytable.
Dimitar Georgievski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the process under which the update is running reports among the usual
process data UPDATE waiting.
I don't think the UPDATE is doing anything at all --- that ps output
implies that it's waiting for some other backend to release an exclusive
lock on
On Thursday 15 April 2004 09:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
good day toall..
imm running postgreSQL on linux.
my main goal is to create a script that will dump a data from our server
too my local PC. the content of the script would be execute sql command
in one shot: 1. dump data
2. update
14 matches
Mail list logo
