Hi,
Plesae read my previous message in this mail list,
on 2006-08-15. 14.20 at " [SQL] Undo an update" thread.
bye,
kjt
McAfee SCM 4.1 által ellenőrizve!
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriat
Hi ..
I am using date is data type to one of the field in my table….but
when ever I am passing values to that field it is taking yyy-mm-dd format..
But I don’t want like that .. I need like this DD-MM-..
for this wt I have to do…
Thanks & Regards
Penchal reddy | Software En
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:46:11PM +0530, Penchalaiah P. wrote:
> I am using date is data type to one of the field in my tablebut when
> ever I am passing values to that field it is taking yyy-mm-dd format..
>
> But I don't want like that .. I need like this DD-MM-.. for this wt
> I have t
Penchalaiah P. wrote:
> I am using date is data type to one of the field in my tablebut when
> ever I am passing values to that field it is taking yyy-mm-dd format..
>
> But I don't want like that .. I need like this DD-MM-.. for this wt
> I have to do...
Read the documentation on the "D
Given a view like: create view view1 as select g.id as UserGroupId, s.uid as UserId, s.time as StartTime from stats s join groups g on g.uid = s.uid and a SELECT like: select a.UserGroupId,b.UserGroupId from view1 a full outer join view1 b on b.UserGroupId = a.UserGroupId WHERE a.StartTime >= '2
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Brian Cox wrote:
> Given a view like:
>
> create view view1 as
> select g.id as UserGroupId, s.uid as UserId, s.time as StartTime from stats
> s join groups g on g.uid = s.uid
>
> and a SELECT like:
>
> select a.UserGroupId,b.UserGroupId from view1 a
> full outer join vi
Hi,
Is AS in "SELECT my_column AS my_name FROM my_table" mandatory to be SQL92
compliant?
PostgreSQL requires this keyword by default when defining alias, which might
be good thing. I mean, I would prefer being notified from a syntax error
than spending a couple of hours wondering why a client a
Hi,
I am fairly new to PostgreSQL but not to SQL. Is this a bug or a
limitation...
The first query works fine, but when a second sub-query is added I get a
syntax error...
psql protocal2 -U p2user << EOF1
select *
from serv_res SR
where serv_key = 10
and not exists
On Aug 23, 2006, at 10:40 , Daniel CAUNE wrote:
Hi,
Is AS in "SELECT my_column AS my_name FROM my_table" mandatory to
be SQL92
compliant?
You can find this in the documentation:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/sql-select.html#AEN48391
The AS Key Word
In the SQL standard,
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:47:51PM -0700, chrisj wrote:
> The first query works fine, but when a second sub-query is added I get a
> syntax error...
>
> psql protocal2 -U p2user << EOF1
> select *
>from serv_res SR
>where serv_key = 10
> and not exists
> (
chrisj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: Hi,I am fairly new to PostgreSQL but not to SQL. Is this a bug or alimitation...The first query works fine, but when a second sub-query is added I get asyntax error...psql protocal2 -U p2user << EOF1select * from serv_res SR where serv_key = 10
thanks, stupid user error.
i guess the pointer on the error message led me astray
Michael Fuhr wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:47:51PM -0700, chrisj wrote:
>> The first query works fine, but when a second sub-query is added I get a
>> syntax error...
>>
>> psql protocal2 -U p2user << EO
12 matches
Mail list logo