"Rajesh Kumar Mallah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am I correct in understanding that the current behavior is inappropriate
> and shall be corrected at some point of time in future versions ?
It's a bug, it's patched:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2008-01/msg00184.php
On Jan 12, 2008 1:26 AM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Rajesh Kumar Mallah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > looks like constraint exclusion is being too aggressive in excluding null
> > values
>
> Hmm, you're right. Looks like I broke it here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-commi
Thanks! How would I find the highest score in the union of the two tables?
I tried this but it can't find unionTable:
SELECT * FROM
(select fnam1 as fname,lname1 as lname, score1 as score
from myscorestable
union
select fnam2 as fname,lname2 as lname, score2 as score
from myscorestable) as union
Kevin Jenkins wrote:
Hi,
I have the following table which holds the result of 1 on 1 matches:
FName1, LName1, Score1, FName2, LName2, Score2, Date
John, Doe,85 Bill, Gates, 20 Jan 1.
John, Archer, 90 John, Doe,120 Jan 5
Bob,Barker, 70 Calvin, Klien
Hi,
I have the following table which holds the result of 1 on 1 matches:
FName1, LName1, Score1, FName2, LName2, Score2, Date
John, Doe,85 Bill, Gates, 20 Jan 1.
John, Archer, 90 John, Doe,120 Jan 5
Bob,Barker, 70 Calvin, Klien 8 Jan 8
John,
"Rajesh Kumar Mallah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> looks like constraint exclusion is being too aggressive in excluding null
> values
Hmm, you're right. Looks like I broke it here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-05/msg00187.php
> although its well known that check constra
Added to TODO:
> * Add ability to trigger on TRUNCATE
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2008-01/msg00050.php
---
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 08:24 +, Richard Huxton wrote:
>
> > I've always
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 08:24 +, Richard Huxton wrote:
> I've always considered TRUNCATE to be DDL rather than DML. I mentally
> group it with DROP TABLE rather than DELETE>
DDL/DML probably isn't the right split, since its then arguable as to
which group of commands it belongs in.
I see we
On Jan 11, 2008, at 2:24 AM, Richard Huxton wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
My thinking is that a TRUNCATE trigger is a per-statement trigger
which
doesn't have access to the set of deleted rows (Replicator uses
it that
way -- we replicate the truncate act
Hello
> By the way, is there any performance difference between pure SQL and
> PL/pgSQL stored functions? If I remember correctly there was such a
> distinction between pure SQL statement and PL/PLSQL stored procedures
> (Oracle), in the sense that PL/PLSQL stored procedures are executed
> within
> What about
> $$
> INSERT INTO ;
> select currval('seq_matchmaking_session_id');
> $$ language sql;
>
> ?
Indeed... :-( For some reason, I thought that it was not possible to
have to SQL statement in an SQL stored function.
By the way, is there any performance difference between pure SQL a
On Jan 11, 2008 4:23 AM, Daniel Caune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please ignore my post. I havent' read your message carefully enough.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://
On Jan 11, 2008 4:23 AM, Daniel Caune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way to define a SQL stored function that inserts a row in a
> table and returns the serial generated?
Maybe you just need INSERT ... RETURNING?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/sql-insert.html
"
Daniel Caune wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way to define a SQL stored function that inserts a row in a
table and returns the serial generated?
CREATE TABLE matchmaking_session
(
session_id bigint NOT NULL DEFAULT
nextval('seq_matchmaking_session_id'),
...
);
CREATE FUNCTION create_matchmaking_ses
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
My thinking is that a TRUNCATE trigger is a per-statement trigger which
doesn't have access to the set of deleted rows (Replicator uses it that
way -- we replicate the truncate action, and replay it on the replica).
In that way it would
15 matches
Mail list logo
