2010/3/18 Tom Lane :
> Dmitriy Igrishin writes:
>> I am using Emacs recently. I love sql-mode, to use with PostgreSQL,
>> but I have problems with it.
>> When my SQL file (or buffer) are small (50-100 lines) I can send
>> it to SQLi buffer without any problems. But when I working with
>> large SQL
Hello
try to look on
http://www.postgres.cz/index.php/PostgreSQL_SQL_Tricks#Terminal.27s_configuration
Regards
Pavel Stehule
2010/3/18 Dmitriy Igrishin :
> Hello all Emacs users!
>
> I am using Emacs recently. I love sql-mode, to use with PostgreSQL,
> but I have problems with it.
> When my SQL
Dmitriy Igrishin writes:
> I am using Emacs recently. I love sql-mode, to use with PostgreSQL,
> but I have problems with it.
> When my SQL file (or buffer) are small (50-100 lines) I can send
> it to SQLi buffer without any problems. But when I working with
> large SQL file (e.g. complex database
Hello all Emacs users!
I am using Emacs recently. I love sql-mode, to use with PostgreSQL,
but I have problems with it.
When my SQL file (or buffer) are small (50-100 lines) I can send
it to SQLi buffer without any problems. But when I working with
large SQL file (e.g. complex database model, thou
Justin,
Thanks in advance for your email. I forgot to tell than everyday IDs must start
from 0. So… sequence id would look like: MMDD 0001, MMDD 0002,
etc.
Is there any way to make this sequence start from 0 every day?
Thanks & Regards,
Ignacio
De: Justin Graf
OOPS did not mean to click send
On 3/18/2010 12:53 PM, Ignacio Balcarce wrote:
>
> Justin,
>
> Thanks in advance for your email. I forgot to tell than everyday IDs
> must start from 0. So… sequence id would look like: MMDD 0001,
> MMDD 0002, etc.
>
> Is there any way to make this
On 3/18/2010 12:53 PM, Ignacio Balcarce wrote:
>
> Justin,
>
> Thanks in advance for your email. I forgot to tell than everyday IDs
> must start from 0. So… sequence id would look like: MMDD 0001,
> MMDD 0002, etc.
>
> Is there any way to make this sequence start from 0 every day?
On 3/17/2010 9:52 AM, Ignacio Balcarce wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am facing a problem trying to convert from MSSQL procedure to
> PostgreSQL function.
>
> CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.THUBAN_SP_GENERATEID
>
> @NEWID VARCHAR(20) OUTPUT
>
> AS
>
> SET @NEWID = (
>
> SELECT REPLACE(SUBSTRING(CONVERT(C
Thanks, Joe and Tom. You cleared the webs out of my brain. I used
HAVING before, but not lately and I got rusty.
Mark
Tom Lane wrote:
Mark Fenbers writes:
I want to do:
SELECT id, count(*) FROM mytable WHERE count(*) > 2 GROUP BY id;
But this doesn't work b
Mark Fenbers writes:
> I want to do:
> SELECT id, count(*) FROM mytable WHERE count(*) > 2 GROUP BY id;
> But this doesn't work because Pg won't allow aggregate functions in a
> where clause.
Use HAVING, not WHERE. The way you are trying to write the query is
meaningless because WHERE filters
Mark,
Change your query to this:
SELECT id, count(*) FROM mytable GROUP BY id HAVING count(*) > 2;
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org] On
Behalf Of Mark Fenbers
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:07 AM
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql
I want to do:
SELECT id, count(*) FROM mytable WHERE count(*) > 2 GROUP BY id;
But this doesn't work because Pg won't allow aggregate functions in a
where clause. So I modified it to:
SELECT id, count(*) AS cnt FROM mytable WHERE cnt > 2 GROUP BY id;
But Pg still complains (that column cnt
On 03/17/10 17:52, Ignacio Balcarce wrote:
-- IF EXISTS A ROW IN THE TABLE STARTING WITH THE CURRENT_DATE
Sorry, your field is not an atom => your database does not met a FIRST
normal form.
it needs normalization urgently.
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To mak
On 03/17/10 17:52, Ignacio Balcarce wrote:
CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.THUBAN_SP_GENERATEID
@NEWID VARCHAR(20) OUTPUT
AS
SET @NEWID = (
SELECT REPLACE(SUBSTRING(CONVERT(CHAR(10),GETDATE(),20 ),1,10),'-','')
+ CAST(REPLICATE(0,8-LEN (ISNULL(CAST(SUBSTRING(MAX(SEQ_ID),9,8) AS
INTEGER),0) +
14 matches
Mail list logo
