Branch: refs/heads/3.0
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Commit: 24accedbcb9668d8c38a530829a0d4cf221ee35e
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/24accedbcb9668d8c38a530829a0d4cf221ee35e
Author: Jenkins Build Server
Date: 2013-10-06 (Sun, 06 Oct 2013
Branch: refs/tags/30457
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2.1-Validation/label=win/578/
1 regressions found.
Zinc.Zodiac.ZnHTTPSTests.testGetPharoVersion
30457
-
11791 trivial critic cleanup in ClassOrganizer
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11791
11802 Fix failing tests Ecompletion
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11802
11765 whichSelectorsReallyRead: --> fix whichSelectorsRead: instead
https://pharo
Hi! We're sending this automatic email twice a month, to give the community an
opportunity to easily know what's happening and to coordinate efforts. Just
answer informally, and feel free to spawn discussions thereafter!
### Here's what I've been up to since the last WhatsUp:
- $HEROIC_ACHIEVE
+1
Doru
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Benjamin <
benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am in for splitting Morphic in more that one package.
>
> It makes things really boring to have every thing in one MC Package :(
>
> Ben
>
> On Oct 6, 2013, at 8:54 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
> wrote
I am in for splitting Morphic in more that one package.
It makes things really boring to have every thing in one MC Package :(
Ben
On Oct 6, 2013, at 8:54 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I started to play with sorting a bit Morphic :)
> So I would like to create a new Package Morphi
On Oct 6, 2013, at 8:16 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> And
>
> NewListExample new
> withNewList;
> openInWindow.
>
> does not work.
>
> separatorAfter: item at: index
>
> ^ separatorSelector
> ifNotNil: [ self model perform: separatorSelector with: item
> with
Ok I see I was using Moose for the lecture so probably still in 2.0
Stef
On Oct 6, 2013, at 9:26 PM, Camillo Bruni wrote:
>> the only thing that is a bit confusing is that it show "class" and "self" in
>> the basic inspector, but
>> that very useful to have. (and technically class is a field i
> the only thing that is a bit confusing is that it show "class" and "self" in
> the basic inspector, but
> that very useful to have. (and technically class is a field in the object via
> the object header ;-)
it would be nice to distinguish the calculated/virtual values by using a
different f
On Oct 6, 2013, at 8:58 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> Hi
>
> the old inspector defined a hierarchy of specialized inspector and I was
> giving a lecture to serious programmers :)
> and I noticed that they were confused by the inspector when opening
> dictionary because we see the dictionary
I do not fully understand what you mean, but I assume the difference between
a basic inspector on the real fields of an object and a specialized dictionary
inspector which shows the elements in the inspector?
We added the custom dictionary inspector a while ago,
plus there was the right-click menu
Hi
the old inspector defined a hierarchy of specialized inspector and I was giving
a lecture to serious programmers :)
and I noticed that they were confused by the inspector when opening dictionary
because we see the dictionary state.
Stef
> Otherwise, Marcus should undergo some drug tests, his performances are
> suspicious…
indeed :)
It compensates my lack of time :)
>
>
> 2013/10/6 Clément Bera
> Is it me or recently there was many more updates on Pharo than it used to be
> ? Last week I saw 9 to 15 updates per day instead
Hi guys
I started to play with sorting a bit Morphic :)
So I would like to create a new Package Morphics-Widgets with the following
contents.
Morphic-Widgets-Basic
SimpleSwitchMorph
MulticolumnLazyListMorph
SimpleButtonMorph
Otherwise, Marcus should undergo some drug tests, his performances are
suspicious...
2013/10/6 Clément Bera
> Is it me or recently there was many more updates on Pharo than it used to
> be ? Last week I saw 9 to 15 updates per day instead of the usual 3. Do we
> have even more contributors ?
>
Is it me or recently there was many more updates on Pharo than it used to
be ? Last week I saw 9 to 15 updates per day instead of the usual 3. Do we
have even more contributors ?
2013/10/6 Marcus Denker
> 30456
> -
>
> 11789 Trivial Critic clean in *Completion
> https://pharo.fogbug
And
NewListExample new
withNewList;
openInWindow.
does not work.
separatorAfter: item at: index
^ separatorSelector
ifNotNil: [ self model perform: separatorSelector with: item
with: index ]
separatorSelector
is a valueHolder and not a symbol
On 2013-10-06, at 17:36, b...@openinworld.com wrote:
> Camillo Bruni wrote:
>> seems like it works,
>>
>> so by default the pharo-internal projects will have the Area "1. Pharo
>> Image" set.
>>
>> Why the "1."? Well I cannot order the Areas, and the first one is selected
>> by default :P
>>
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2.1-Validation/label=win/577/
4 regressions found.
NECompletion.Tests.NECInstVarTypeGuesserTest.testTypeSuggestingParameter
NECompletion.Tests.NECUntypedModelTest.testCaseSensitive
NECompletion.Tests.NECUntypedModelTest.testCaseSensitivity
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2.1-Validation/label=mac/577/
4 regressions found.
NECompletion.Tests.NECInstVarTypeGuesserTest.testTypeSuggestingParameter
NECompletion.Tests.NECUntypedModelTest.testCaseSensitive
NECompletion.Tests.NECUntypedModelTest.testCaseSensitivity
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-2.1-Validation/label=linux-stable-worker/577/
4 regressions found.
NECompletion.Tests.NECInstVarTypeGuesserTest.testTypeSuggestingParameter
NECompletion.Tests.NECUntypedModelTest.testCaseSensitive
NECompletion.Tests.NECUntypedModelTest.test
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Jean Baptiste Arnaud
wrote:
> Using Nick's process for compiling the vm I reintroduce a process to compile
> StackVM on Rasp.
> So we have a StackVM compiling process on Rasp, with a simple
> CMakeConfiguration class and a simple install script for Rasp.
> Next step
30456
-
11789 Trivial Critic clean in *Completion
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11789
11796 New Critic Rule: Nobody should directly send #methodDict
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11796
Diff information:
http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Tools-Marcu
Just browsing around FogBugz docs a bit, I came across this...
"Users can input any arbitrary javascript and css that you want to run
on any FogBugz page." [1]
I wonder if Amber could be loaded on top Fogbugz to do
something-awesome(TM) with SmalltalkHub integration?
Actually back to reality.
Camillo Bruni wrote:
seems like it works,
so by default the pharo-internal projects will have the Area "1. Pharo Image" set.
Why the "1."? Well I cannot order the Areas, and the first one is selected by default :P
The filter "review" and "integration" now only look at issues that have the
I would first experiment to run the critics only on the modified code, not the
full package :)
Then you can have a pretty accurate feedback
Ben
On Oct 6, 2013, at 4:26 PM, b...@openinworld.com wrote:
> Benjamin wrote:
>>
>> What I would like (and will probably give a try soon) is to run some
I reattached a clean version of the old history to the pharo-vm repository
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/network
As a result all the SHA hashes of the commits changed :/
AFAIK you should be fine with your local copies by pulling the latest changes
from pharo-vm
and merge.
Additiona
On Oct 6, 2013, at 12:51 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote:
>
> I opened a ticket at https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11797 but I'm not sure
> how I am supposed to provide fixes made against a pharo2.0 image. Probably I
> should fix this againt 3.0 but then I'm still a 2.0 user :)
The best is to have
Benjamin wrote:
What I would like (and will probably give a try soon) is to run some critics automatically before committing a MC package :)
That's how it's done in WebStorm by example, and I love this feature
Ben
That sounds cool. Without having used Code Critics yet (I've just
discov
> What I would like (and will probably give a try soon) is to run some critics
> automatically before committing a MC package :)
> That's how it's done in WebStorm by example, and I love this feature
Yes this is a good practice.
> Ben
What I would like (and will probably give a try soon) is to run some critics
automatically before committing a MC package :)
That's how it's done in WebStorm by example, and I love this feature
Ben
On Oct 6, 2013, at 2:19 PM, b...@openinworld.com wrote:
> Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>> Hi
>> I'm r
OSX Lion
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Frank Shearar wrote:
> On 6 October 2013 11:21, p...@highoctane.be wrote:
> > Now, when starting my image:
> >
> > FileWriteError: File stdout is closed
> > MultiByteFileStream(StandardFileStream)>>primWrite:from:startingAt:count:
> > MultiByteFileStrea
seems like it works,
so by default the pharo-internal projects will have the Area "1. Pharo Image"
set.
Why the "1."? Well I cannot order the Areas, and the first one is selected by
default :P
The filter "review" and "integration" now only look at issues that have the
proper Area set.
On 20
ben
this is not that we do not have plan and vision. Just that we have lot of
consumers and not enough people thinking that Pharo is theirs :)
Stef
On Oct 6, 2013, at 2:19 PM, b...@openinworld.com wrote:
> Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>> Hi
>> I'm really happy because
>> "New Critic Rule: N
On 6 October 2013 11:21, p...@highoctane.be wrote:
> Now, when starting my image:
>
> FileWriteError: File stdout is closed
> MultiByteFileStream(StandardFileStream)>>primWrite:from:startingAt:count:
> MultiByteFileStream(StandardFileStream)>>next:putAll:startingAt:
> MultiByteFileStream>>basicNex
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi
I'm really happy because
"New Critic Rule: Nobody should directly send #methodDict" is the way to go. We should document the system design using
automatic rules!
Excellent!
Stef
So you could also have "Critic Rule: Should not implement system
method." Lik
On Oct 6, 2013, at 12:38 AM, Camillo Bruni wrote:
>
> On 2013-10-06, at 00:06, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
>> 11792 First simplistic file system tree inspector
>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11792
>>
>>
>> actually a FileReference tree inspector... lots of improvments possible
>>
I took some time to analyze my current problem with external semaphores. I was
just reluctant to raise the limit in my image because I want the problem
solved. I logged the management of external semaphores and discovered that the
table fills if a connection times out.
The problem turns out to
El 04/10/2013 14:27, Camillo Bruni escribió:
What is that class? No comments, two single methods on Object that refer to it?
A WeakActionSequence is used as container for MessageSend's. It looks
like is not even really weak, there is no weakSubclass: definition...
You probably don't see use
Now, when starting my image:
FileWriteError: File stdout is closed
MultiByteFileStream(StandardFileStream)>>primWrite:from:startingAt:count:
MultiByteFileStream(StandardFileStream)>>next:putAll:startingAt:
MultiByteFileStream>>basicNext:putAll:startingAt:
UTF8TextConverter(TextConverter)>>nextPutB
Hi Pharoers
since we believe in quality and automation, here is a new chapter on Lint rule
support in Pharo :)
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/PharoForTheEnterprise/ws/Lint/Lint.pier.pdf
Stef
Hi
I'm really happy because
"New Critic Rule: Nobody should directly send #methodDict" is the way
to go. We should document the system design using
automatic rules!
Excellent!
Stef
43 matches
Mail list logo
