[Pharo-dev] [pharo-project/pharo-core]

2013-12-08 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/tags/30633 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

[Pharo-dev] [pharo-project/pharo-core] 76bf0c: 30633

2013-12-08 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/3.0 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core Commit: 76bf0c7bf67d5ce70f6b704375f7fa37172061ef https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/76bf0c7bf67d5ce70f6b704375f7fa37172061ef Author: Jenkins Build Server Date: 2013-12-08 (Sun, 08 Dec 2013

Re: [Pharo-dev] Commit right to Pharo30Inbox

2013-12-08 Thread Marcus Denker
On 09 Dec 2013, at 01:11, Hernán Morales Durand wrote: > Hi list. > I want to submit a SLICE to the pharo inbox, can you grant me commit rights? > > username: hernan > Done.

Re: [Pharo-dev] access to MetaRepoForPharo30

2013-12-08 Thread Marcus Denker
On 09 Dec 2013, at 08:05, Tudor Girba wrote: > Hi, > > I would need access to: > http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/MetaRepoForPharo30 > > Actually, could I be added to the Pharo team? > Done. Marcus

[Pharo-dev] access to MetaRepoForPharo30

2013-12-08 Thread Tudor Girba
Hi, I would need access to: http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/MetaRepoForPharo30 Actually, could I be added to the Pharo team? Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Re: [Pharo-dev] Using TreeModel>>selectAll

2013-12-08 Thread Martin Dias
Hi, I'm back with more annoying questions :) Using #whenSelectedItemsChanged:, I see that the block is evaluated a lot of times: log := OrderedCollection new. roots := #(1 2) collect: [ :each | TreeNodeModel new content: each; selected: true; yourself ]. TreeModel new roots: roots; multiSelect

Re: [Pharo-dev] Voronoi diagram

2013-12-08 Thread Alexandre Bergel
By the way, on what are you working on these days? Alexandre > Le 08-12-2013 à 20:50, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit : > > >> On 09 Dec 2013, at 00:43, Alexandre Bergel wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> I have just integrated it. I was not sure whether you have finished it or >> not. > > Cool, it’s a pleasan

[Pharo-dev] Commit right to Pharo30Inbox

2013-12-08 Thread Hernán Morales Durand
Hi list. I want to submit a SLICE to the pharo inbox, can you grant me commit rights? username: hernan thanks! Hernán

Re: [Pharo-dev] Voronoi diagram

2013-12-08 Thread Yuriy Tymchuk
On 09 Dec 2013, at 00:43, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > Hi! > > I have just integrated it. I was not sure whether you have finished it or not. Cool, it’s a pleasant feeling to know that your work was included somewhere :) Thanks. Uko > > Cheers, > Alexandre > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^

Re: [Pharo-dev] Voronoi diagram

2013-12-08 Thread Alexandre Bergel
Hi! I have just integrated it. I was not sure whether you have finished it or not. Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. On Dec 8, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote:

Re: [Pharo-dev] Query STHub from outside

2013-12-08 Thread Torsten Bergmann
> It doesn’t find the teams and their projects When I run (NeoJSONReader fromString: (ZnEasy get: 'http://smalltalkhub.com/hub/users?term=') entity string) size I get only 839, the website says 926 users registered So is the rest for teams? Maybe I should dig into the code of STHub. Thanks

Re: [Pharo-dev] Query STHub from outside

2013-12-08 Thread Stephan Eggermont
Hi Torsten, Just take a look at: http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/StephanEggermont/DeprecationFinder/main It is deliberately rate-limited. It doesn’t find the teams and their projects. The API you can find by downloading the SmalltalkHub image from ci. That wants a MongoDB running with default port

Re: [Pharo-dev] It would be too expensive to add a description for packages in Configuration Browser?

2013-12-08 Thread Hernán Morales Durand
El 08/12/2013 19:04, Torsten Bergmann escribió: Hi Hernan, the problem is not the button - but the missing standard and standardized descriptions on the configs... I see. Let's attack the real problem then. For instance I also write markup docu on my configs (see ConfigurationOfINIFile) - it

[Pharo-dev] Query STHub from outside

2013-12-08 Thread Torsten Bergmann
Is it possible to query STHub from within the image (so is there a web API to query for available users, projects, project descritions, ...) Thx T.

Re: [Pharo-dev] It would be too expensive to add a description for packages in Configuration Browser?

2013-12-08 Thread Torsten Bergmann
Hi Hernan,   the problem is not the button - but the missing standard and standardized descriptions on the configs...   For instance I also write markup docu on my configs (see ConfigurationOfINIFile) - it is loadable as a usual config but adds two class side methods: #documentation and #tut

Re: [Pharo-dev] It would be too expensive to add a description for packages in Configuration Browser?

2013-12-08 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
> I agree (see attached screenshot). I have added the button but the thing is: > Package can be fetched from the repository, but there is no package > description. There are only textual descriptions of commits. If you have a look at the packages I maintain I added catalog metadata to htem and

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalk in a C World

2013-12-08 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
> Yes - still alive and kicking. But I'm sure you did not notice since there > are no "big" announcements or advertising for it. > ObjectConnect follows the "time is better invested into technology" strategy. > It is one of the most interesting Smalltalks ever implemented. http://www.objectconn

Re: [Pharo-dev] It would be too expensive to add a description for packages in Configuration Browser?

2013-12-08 Thread Hernán Morales Durand
Hi Torsten, 2013/12/8 Torsten Bergmann > The reason is simple: when I wrote the config browser > there was no such additional description on the configs itself > and one would have to load the config into the image first. > > Think of 2000 config's (note each is a package) loading in the future

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalk in a C World

2013-12-08 Thread Marcus Denker
On 08 Dec 2013, at 21:47, Marcus Denker wrote: > > On 08 Dec 2013, at 21:44, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > >>> Is Smalltalk/MT still "alive"? >> >> Yes - still alive and kicking. But I'm sure you did not notice since there >> are no "big" announcements or advertising for it. > > For me this is

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalk in a C World

2013-12-08 Thread Marcus Denker
On 08 Dec 2013, at 21:44, Torsten Bergmann wrote: >> Is Smalltalk/MT still "alive"? > > Yes - still alive and kicking. But I'm sure you did not notice since there > are no "big" announcements or advertising for it. For me this is a nice way of saying “its dead”. > ObjectConnect follows the "

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalk in a C World

2013-12-08 Thread Torsten Bergmann
> Is Smalltalk/MT still "alive"? Yes - still alive and kicking. But I'm sure you did not notice since there are no "big" announcements or advertising for it. ObjectConnect follows the "time is better invested into technology" strategy. It is one of the most interesting Smalltalks ever implemented

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalk in a C World

2013-12-08 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
Is Smalltalk/MT still "alive"? I remember them as the only Smalltalk dialect having in-process COM servers, whilst Dolphin only had out of process. I think they also had realtime and threading features no other Smalltalk, at that time, had. Regards, Esteban A. Maringolo 2013/12/8 Torsten Bergma

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalk in a C World

2013-12-08 Thread Torsten Bergmann
Usually plugins for CAD programs have to be running in-process. Pharo is not (at least not without further work) running in a DLL as by default it runs as an own OS process. There once was a plugin for Netscape and one for IE running Squeak VM as a in-process plugin in the browser - so its technic

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalk in a C World

2013-12-08 Thread kilon alios
Sort answer is no , Pharo does not try to replace C/C++. CAD plugins are indeed dlls and you will need C/C++ for that. I only Know Free Pascal as another language to generate DLLs but even in that case its extra work. So if you look for the most direct solution then Pharo wont cut it and probably

Re: [Pharo-dev] Searchbar in the browser

2013-12-08 Thread Usman Bhatti
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > > On Dec 8, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Alexandre Bergel > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > You may have noticed that Nautilus now has a search bar next to the list > of packages. I personally find this extremely useful. This is the work of > Juraj and

Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalk in a C World

2013-12-08 Thread askoh
Good that NativeBoost can do what the paper says. How does one debug Pharo and NativeBoost working together? Can one step in Pharo, encounter NativeBoost code, the step in C and return to Pharo? I would like to create addins for CAD programs (Windows for now). The CAD program starts and calls the

Re: [Pharo-dev] Searchbar in the browser

2013-12-08 Thread kilon alios
Emacs employs fuzzy completion. That means that you only have to type a partial match that exists in anywhere in the result or even fragments of a partial match making for very flexible search. For example if I look for "filesystem" and yet I type"systemfile" or "sysfile" or "file-syse" etc, the se

Re: [Pharo-dev] Searchbar in the browser

2013-12-08 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Another pponit about the search it would be good to have the following behavior I type TOOLS I see all the packages with TOOLS I select one then I removed TOOLS from the search bar -> the selected package stays selected Stef

Re: [Pharo-dev] Searchbar in the browser

2013-12-08 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
>>> Hi All, >>> >>> You may have noticed that Nautilus now has a search bar next to the list of >>> packages. I personally find this extremely useful. This is the work of >>> Juraj and he is interested in hearing your feedback. >>> >>> The textfield accepts regular expression. It means that en

Re: [Pharo-dev] Responsible development

2013-12-08 Thread Stephan Eggermont
Stef wrote >Now for example you can load code in a background process now if >you modify objects that may be impacted by changes then you can get in >trouble. Here is a live example of doing that: This is how we load Delphi code in Moose. http://www.flickr.com/photos/35787002@N03/10609428345/

Re: [Pharo-dev] Searchbar in the browser

2013-12-08 Thread Juraj Kubelka
El 08-12-2013, a las 12:41, Stéphane Ducasse escribió: > > On Dec 8, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> You may have noticed that Nautilus now has a search bar next to the list of >> packages. I personally find this extremely useful. This is the work of Juraj >>

Re: [Pharo-dev] Searchbar in the browser

2013-12-08 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
On Dec 8, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > Hi All, > > You may have noticed that Nautilus now has a search bar next to the list of > packages. I personally find this extremely useful. This is the work of Juraj > and he is interested in hearing your feedback. > > The textfield acc

[Pharo-dev] Searchbar in the browser

2013-12-08 Thread Alexandre Bergel
Hi All, You may have noticed that Nautilus now has a search bar next to the list of packages. I personally find this extremely useful. This is the work of Juraj and he is interested in hearing your feedback. The textfield accepts regular expression. It means that entering “Roassal” will displ

[Pharo-dev] FogBugz mac os x app

2013-12-08 Thread Serge Stinckwich
Apparently there is an OS X app to manage FogBugz issues: http://www.irradiatedsoftware.com/tickets/ Cheers, -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/

Re: [Pharo-dev] Voronoi diagram

2013-12-08 Thread Yuriy Tymchuk
Yeah, by the way, is my rectangle packing layout integrated? Uko On 08 Dec 2013, at 14:36, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > Hi! > > I have planned to have some people on having Voronoi in Roassal in March. > > Alexandre > > >> On 7 Dec 2013, at 13:59, Natalia Tymchuk >> wrote: >> >> Hello. >>

Re: [Pharo-dev] Voronoi diagram

2013-12-08 Thread Alexandre Bergel
Hi! I have planned to have some people on having Voronoi in Roassal in March. Alexandre > On 7 Dec 2013, at 13:59, Natalia Tymchuk > wrote: > > Hello. > I started implementing visualization of Voronoi diagrams and I need to do a > lot of operations on the lines and polygons. I have some q

Re: [Pharo-dev] It would be too expensive to add a description for packages in Configuration Browser?

2013-12-08 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
On Dec 8, 2013, at 11:16 AM, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > The reason is simple: when I wrote the config browser > there was no such additional description on the configs itself > and one would have to load the config into the image first. > > Think of 2000 config's (note each is a package) loading

Re: [Pharo-dev] It would be too expensive to add a description for packages in Configuration Browser?

2013-12-08 Thread Alain Plantec
> Nobody payed attention to this but this is really nice and supporting self > documentation. i said i will weeks ago. I will try today. Alain > > > > > > > stef

Re: [Pharo-dev] It would be too expensive to add a description for packages in Configuration Browser?

2013-12-08 Thread Torsten Bergmann
The reason is simple: when I wrote the config browser there was no such additional description on the configs itself and one would have to load the config into the image first. Think of 2000 config's (note each is a package) loading in the future when the config browser opens. This will take ages.

Re: [Pharo-dev] It would be too expensive to add a description for packages in Configuration Browser?

2013-12-08 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
On 08 Dec 2013, at 09:31, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > really simple 4 class side methods OK, I see that this can be in Pier syntax. No problem for me, but that does mean that we’ll need a Pier parser and renderer in the base image, no ? Else tools will not be able to show this, right ?

Re: [Pharo-dev] It would be too expensive to add a description for packages in Configuration Browser?

2013-12-08 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
On Dec 7, 2013, at 11:46 PM, Hernán Morales Durand wrote: > Ok. I am taking a look now, still trying to figure out how Spec manage the > layout offsets. Should I commit changes as a Slice in > http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30Inbox/main ? Yes with a bug entry. I will be great liek tha

Re: [Pharo-dev] It would be too expensive to add a description for packages in Configuration Browser?

2013-12-08 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
>> We added catalog metadata to configuration now >> - the tools should take into account about that >> - people should add such metadata to their configuration >> >> If you modify the package browser to present description it will be in the >> system > > Stef, what is the spec, the