Hi Levente,
Le 28/09/2015 23:54, Levente Uzonyi a écrit :
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015, Ferlicot D. Cyril wrote:
An other point is that git file tree will not work on Windows if we do
not fix the problem of the stdio. And a lot of people out of the
community use Windows, so this is not a issue we
Well, there is some kind of but I was tired and the stream broke as my
internet connection went bust.
(and I should have done the full setup). Ah these things pile up.
Still, one can see the trainwreck over here:
https://www.livecoding.tv/philippeback/videos/
Pick the things with "git" in the
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015, Ferlicot D. Cyril wrote:
Le 27/09/2015 12:11, Dimitris Chloupis a écrit :
we have more than a nice Git integration. I have been using Github for
my pharo project for over a year now without any issue, the last few
months I have been using gitfiltree which is making it even
> On 20 Sep 2015, at 16:17, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
>
>> On 19 Sep 2015, at 01:10, stepharo wrote:
>>
>> Marcus I have a API design question
>>
>> when you offer
>>
>> options: #(optionOneShot);
>>
>> versus
>>
>> optionOneShot
>>
>> Do you do a
On 28-09-15 16:22, Marcus Denker wrote:
Pharo touch demo with the new OSWindows architecture, touch events, vector
graphics using Athens and libsdl2.
Thanks the people involved (specifically for the touch project Christopher
Coat, Mervan Ougdane, Jan-Baptiste Arnaud,
Eric Lepors and Mathieu
Branch: refs/heads/5.0
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Commit: 306d7616cbcc0f10b4931ae71c3dc296869a8d35
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/306d7616cbcc0f10b4931ae71c3dc296869a8d35
Author: Jenkins Build Server
Date:
Branch: refs/tags/50345
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
On 9/27/15 11:53 PM, stepharo wrote:
Le 27/9/15 15:33, Peter Uhnák a écrit :
Because to me git is **really** complex. I do not talk about add
push commit but rebase remote
Git allows you to do complex things if you need them.
But you can easily use git without ever needing
Yes, debug code left. I fixed it already… I should have seen it when going
through the diff...
> On 28 Sep 2015, at 15:57, Henrik Nergaard wrote:
>
> Yeah, that might be my mistake.
> Looking into it now -> loading 16648 changes the color.
>
> Best regards,
> Henrik
> On 28 Sep 2015, at 04:27, Ben Coman wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Esteban Lorenzano
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’ve been using git for all my projects since more than one year now, and
>> frankly I found it really good… and the pull
2015-09-28 8:53 GMT+02:00 stepharo :
>
>
> Le 27/9/15 15:33, Peter Uhnák a écrit :
>
> Because to me git is **really** complex. I do not talk about add push
>> commit but rebase remote
>>
>
> Git allows you to do complex things if you need them.
> But you can easily use git
>
> sure except that suddenly you do not know why you have to know the arcanes
>> part.
>> I think that git is not layered so you get exposed to a lot of details
>> even when you avoid.
>>
>
Hmm, I don't see that, but I've been using git for many years so I am not
in position to judge it how
Le 28/09/2015 04:27, Ben Coman a écrit :
I have a vague recollection that the problem was a particular file
where data changed each commit and having the idea that this might be
solved by: each commit writing metadata to a different file e.g.
.metadata, and Monticello knows to pick up the
Le 27/9/15 15:33, Peter Uhnák a écrit :
Because to me git is **really** complex. I do not talk about add
push commit but rebase remote
Git allows you to do complex things if you need them.
But you can easily use git without ever needing rebase, filter-branch
or whatnot.
> On 24 Sep 2015, at 4:27 , Geert Claes wrote:
>
> The admin duties have now been handed over to Sean DeNigris who kindly
> volunteered to look after the www.world.st web presence as well as the
> Nabble archived mailing list forums on forum.world.st.
>
> As mentioned
Peter Uhnák writes:
> So would it make sense to swap the priority?
I agree with you.
--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill
2015-09-28 13:57 GMT+02:00 Ben Coman :
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Thierry Goubier
> wrote:
> > Le 28/09/2015 04:27, Ben Coman a écrit :
> >>
> >>
> >> I have a vague recollection that the problem was a particular file
> >> where data
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Thierry Goubier
wrote:
> Le 28/09/2015 04:27, Ben Coman a écrit :
>>
>>
>> I have a vague recollection that the problem was a particular file
>> where data changed each commit and having the idea that this might be
>> solved by: each
On 28-09-15 04:27, Ben Coman wrote:
Git is very flexible which implies complexity for newcomers to it.
What is required on top of git is a "well defined" workflow.I see
sometimes on this mail-list that people design their tools for
flexibility since they don't want to *impose* a workflow on
Video are good. But please, do not show trivial things. Show us an example with
several users and conflict resolution.
Alexandre
> On Sep 28, 2015, at 10:59 AM, Damien Cassou wrote:
>
>
> philippe.b...@highoctane.be writes:
>
>> It isn't.
Alexandre Bergel writes:
> I have tried several times to use Git for my project. But I do not
> want to spend time on configuring .gitattribute and other
> configuration file. This does not go in the right direction I believe.
> Why is it easier to use git with Java
philippe.b...@highoctane.be writes:
> It isn't. It is actually very easy to use git.
>
> Time for a video :-)
>
> Expect that for tomorrow.
tomorrow is today :-). We expect it!
Thanks Philippe
--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
"Success is the
>
> If there are so many windows users
There are many windows users,
there are NOT many windows + git users.
Probably because everyone gives up on gitfiletree after ten minutes and
switch to regular filetree.
I think that none of the developers of Git in Pharo / gitfiletree use
Windows, so some
Le 28/09/2015 23:54, Levente Uzonyi a écrit :
>
> If there are so many windows users, then how can it be that none of them
> managed to explain what the actual problem with stdio handling is. I had
> asked about the problem a while ago, but I still haven't got an answer:
>
How practical it is to do set-based comparison
in TestAsserter>>assertCollection:hasSameElements: ?
For example #(1 1 2) has same elements as #(1 2) which may make sense for
sets, but not for bags.
The main reason I was using it is that in tests the expected collection may
be created by hand,
The big issue for git and windows (in general) is that there is a 255
character limit on the paths for files I recently pruned some file
names for Metacello (on a win-hack branch) just to get Metacello to work
with filetree ..
Working with Github Desktop[1] for Windows makes the
On 09/28/2015 04:13 PM, Ferlicot D. Cyril wrote:
Le 28/09/2015 23:54, Levente Uzonyi a écrit :
If there are so many windows users, then how can it be that none of them
managed to explain what the actual problem with stdio handling is. I had
asked about the problem a while ago, but I still
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Ferlicot D. Cyril wrote:
Le 28/09/2015 23:54, Levente Uzonyi a écrit :
If there are so many windows users, then how can it be that none of them
managed to explain what the actual problem with stdio handling is. I had
asked about the problem a while ago, but I still
Le 28 sept. 2015 à 13:57, Ben Coman a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Thierry Goubier
> wrote:
>> Le 28/09/2015 04:27, Ben Coman a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>> I have a vague recollection that the problem was a particular file
>>> where data changed each commit
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Thierry Goubier
wrote:
>
>
> 2015-09-28 13:57 GMT+02:00 Ben Coman :
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Thierry Goubier
>> wrote:
>> > Le 28/09/2015 04:27, Ben Coman a écrit :
>> >>
>>
> On 28 Sep 2015, at 13:57, Ben Coman wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Thierry Goubier
> wrote:
>> Le 28/09/2015 04:27, Ben Coman a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>> I have a vague recollection that the problem was a particular file
>>> where
Branch: refs/heads/5.0
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Commit: 07c9a04969c9a4afbe64c1ca0dabfe5a1bee
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/07c9a04969c9a4afbe64c1ca0dabfe5a1bee
Author: Jenkins Build Server
Date:
Branch: refs/tags/50344
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
There is some strange side effect that now the menus have a very odd reddish
color.
I guess this is caused somehow by 16648 or maybe even 16647?
I added a new issue tracker entry for that:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/16652/Menues-now-have-a-very-strange-reddish-color
> Log
Yeah, that might be my mistake.
Looking into it now -> loading 16648 changes the color.
Best regards,
Henrik
-Original Message-
From: Pharo-dev [mailto:pharo-dev-boun...@lists.pharo.org] On Behalf Of Marcus
Denker
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 3:44 PM
To: Pharo Development List
35 matches
Mail list logo