Re: [Pharo-dev] State of Pharo in comparison with the "Pharo vision" document

2016-07-19 Thread Cyril Ferlicot D.
Le 19/07/2016 à 23:59, Julien Delplanque a écrit : Hi, I added what I know after some `>>` > Goals -> State > --- > 1. Creation of the Pharo Consortium -> Created > 2. Small kernel & validated packages -> >>In progress (Bootstrap + Cargo) > 3. A Robust and Extensible System

[Pharo-dev] State of Pharo in comparison with the "Pharo vision" document

2016-07-19 Thread Julien Delplanque
Hello everyone, For a university project I need to write a little about Pharo. I found the "Pharo vision" document [1] and I am curious about the actual state of Pharo in comparison with it. I have seen some things on the mailing list but I would like some help to gather the state of each goal

[Pharo-dev] [pharo-project/pharo-core]

2016-07-19 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/tags/60150 Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] Remote debugging tools

2016-07-19 Thread Ben Coman
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Denis Kudriashov wrote: > > 2016-07-18 18:26 GMT+02:00 Ben Coman : > >> I've been meaning to get a BBB. I looks like bit better platform for >> an industrial controller / robotics than the Rpi - in particular its >>

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo 5.0 Tiny Feature Request

2016-07-19 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
Sean P. DeNigris wrote > Great. Done. Slice in inbox: > SLICE-Issue-18757-Simple-Shell-Command-Eval-for-50-SeanDeNigris.1 Reviewed by the monkey. Please integrate at your earliest convenience :) https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/18757/Simple-Shell-Command-Eval-for-5-0 - Cheers, Sean --

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] Remote debugging tools

2016-07-19 Thread Denis Kudriashov
2016-07-18 18:26 GMT+02:00 Ben Coman : > I've been meaning to get a BBB. I looks like bit better platform for > an industrial controller / robotics than the Rpi - in particular its > Programming Realtime Unit. Knowing someone else has one maybe I'll > get one now. In the

Re: [Pharo-dev] git iceberg and gitfiletree

2016-07-19 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
Hi, Nico can answer better, but he is also in holidays. So, here my current understanding: > On 18 Jul 2016, at 19:11, Peter Uhnak wrote: > > Hi, > > since my question in the bugtracker went under the radar, I am asking here. > > What is the underlying export format of