Re: [Pharo-dev] Human Reviews of Pull Requests

Hi Guillermo, Ronie has worked on porting a part of Torch to work with Git PullRequest. Ronie, can you let Guillermo know how he can try your tool? Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu

Re: [Pharo-dev] Human Reviews of Pull Requests

Hi Guille, On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 09:30:02AM +0200, Guillermo Polito wrote: > Hi all, > > As PRs are starting to stack, I think it would be good to gradually merge > them. > For that, I think it would be good to have both the automatic and a human > review. > > When you issue a PR to the

Re: [Pharo-dev] Epicea applying multiple changes

It is issue 20223 2017-07-19 9:41 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba : > Hi, > > I experienced the same issues. It seems somehow related that when we have > multiple changes to

Re: [Pharo-dev] Improving formatting [was: Big claps for Epicea (small request!)]

Hi Nicolas > The formatter is dumb. > Let's illustrate it with literals among other things. > I might want to write 16rBADA55, but I'm sure i never want to read > 12245589, it makes no sense ;) I wonder where you see this problem? Formatting method in Nautilus works fine. Try checkbox "format