Hi Ben,
On 29 November 2017 at 06:51, Ben Coman wrote:
> On 29 November 2017 at 02:40, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> I think you forgot to give Iceberg the "src" subdirectory where all the code
>> packages reside.
>
> Not such much forgot and
On 29 November 2017 at 07:50, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> Stephan Eggermont-3 wrote
>>>2c) Code subdirectory: enter "src" here !!!
>> Do we really need that? Why would I care about that?
>
> BTW in latest Iceberg this is automatically selected if it is one of the
>
On 29 November 2017 at 02:40, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> I think you forgot to give Iceberg the "src" subdirectory where all the code
> packages reside.
Not such much forgot and not being aware of the impact of that field :P ;)
> When you forget to give the "Code
A minor thing, but a fix is probably easy...
I have...
FFIExternalStructure subclass: #CXSourceLocation
instanceVariableNames: ''
classVariableNames: 'VoidPointer2'
package: 'Libclang'
initialize
"self initialize"
VoidPointer2 := FFITypeArray ofType: 'void*' size: 2.
fieldsDesc
demarey wrote
>> pre Pharo-5 image
> It probably means that the command used to determine the image version
> failed!
Oh, are Pharo 4 and prior supposed to work? I figured they were just not
intended to be supported
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
Sent from:
Stephan Eggermont-3 wrote
>>2c) Code subdirectory: enter "src" here !!!
> Do we really need that? Why would I care about that?
BTW in latest Iceberg this is automatically selected if it is one of the
standard names (e.g. src, repository)
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
Sent from:
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #346 was: FAILURE.
The Pull Request #559 was integrated:
"20777-Fix-instVarAt-instVarAt-put-comment"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/559
Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20777
Build
You do not have to use "src" or "repository" - you can store your packages
directly in the root if you
like. You are free to choose. But over time it can "bloat" the topmost level of
your project with the
Smalltalk packages folders and it might get confusing the more packages you
have or the
On 28.11.2017 17:33, Christophe Demarey wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> Le 25 nov. 2017 à 21:45, Volkert a écrit :
>>
>> The PharoLauncher is really nice ...
>>
>> Is it possible to use a 64Bit VM run an Image (6.1 >)? Per default a
>> 32bit VM is downloaded.
> Yes, Pharo
> On 28 Nov 2017, at 16:25, Ben Coman wrote:
>
> I just bumped into...
>FFUInt64>>basicHandle: aHandle at: index
>^ aHandle signedLongLongAt: index
that’s probably a bug :)
Esteban
>
> and I'm curious why #unsignedLongLongAt: is not used.
> Seems I had the
On 28-11-17 19:40, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
2c) Code subdirectory: enter "src" here !!!
Do we really need that? Why would I care about that?
Stephan
Hi,
Launcher is a power tool and has helped many of us so far. Thanks to all who
helped moving
it forward, especially Christophe who is currently caring a lot.
Unfortunately one primary issue is not yet solved:
The downloadable files for Pharo 7 are not correctly displayed (see Screenshot
Hi Ben,
I think you forgot to give Iceberg the "src" subdirectory where all the code
packages reside.
When you forget to give the "Code subdirectory" in the dialog the repo points
to the
bencoman/libclang-pharo-bindings root which has no packages. Thats why the
packages
pane is empty.
So I
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Christophe Demarey <
christophe.dema...@inria.fr> wrote:
> Hi Mariano,
>
> > Le 27 nov. 2017 à 03:08, Mariano Martinez Peck
> a écrit :
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Thank you Christophe for continue pushing this useful tool!
> >
> > One small
Hi Mariano,
> Le 27 nov. 2017 à 03:08, Mariano Martinez Peck a
> écrit :
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Thank you Christophe for continue pushing this useful tool!
>
> One small request which might be easy to do... Quite frequently I want to do
> something and re-save an image I
Hi,
> Le 25 nov. 2017 à 21:45, Volkert a écrit :
>
> The PharoLauncher is really nice ...
>
> Is it possible to use a 64Bit VM run an Image (6.1 >)? Per default a
> 32bit VM is downloaded.
Yes, Pharo Launcher manages 32-bits and 64-bits VM.
> Le 25 nov. 2017 à 20:08, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit :
>
> bpi wrote
>> UndefinedObject(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #,
>> PhLVirtualMachineManager>>vmFileName
>
> I usually get an error that looks like that when I try to launch a pre
> Pharo-5 image. IIUC when Launcher is
Hi Bernhard,
> Le 25 nov. 2017 à 16:24, Bernhard Pieber a écrit :
>
> Hi Stef,
>
> I just found download links on this page:
> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-launcher
> They point to Jenkins build artefacts.
>
> Thank you for implementing the launcher. As a newbie
I just bumped into...
FFUInt64>>basicHandle: aHandle at: index
^ aHandle signedLongLongAt: index
and I'm curious why #unsignedLongLongAt: is not used.
Seems I had the same question a year ago...
On 1 September 2016 at 22:09, Ben Coman wrote:
> I'm looking
I'm still struggling with Iceberg workflow for a personal repo.
World menu > Iceberg
Clicked
Remote URL <-- g...@github.com:bencoman/libclang-pharo-bindings.git
Clicked
So now I have a new row...
Name = libclang-pharo-bindings
Current Branch = master
Loaded version = No package loaded
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #345 was: FAILURE.
The Pull Request #559 was integrated:
"20777-Fix-instVarAt-instVarAt-put-comment"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/559
Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20777
Build
In Iceberg I am finding the "Create repository" button disconcerting
for some of the Iceberg repository dialogs. For example, clicking
"Add local repository" shows a dialog "Import local repository into
Iceberg" with a "Create repository" button and perception of this
which I can't shake is
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #344 was: SUCCESS.
The Pull Request #557 was integrated: "20772 - Unused temps in
MBConfigurationInfo, MethodDictionaryTest,..."
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/557
Issue Url:
On 28 November 2017 at 16:25, Marcus Denker wrote:
> as for catching message sends of the kind
>
> var = 1 + 2.
>
> (instead of :=), yes, we can add a rule for that.
Cool. I added https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20780
>
>> On 28 Nov 2017, at 09:20, Marcus
2017-11-27 9:20 GMT+01:00 Tudor Girba :
> Hi,
>
> There are recurrent reports that Pharo is crashing often.
>
> However, at the moment I believe the reasons are not clarified. So, this
> mail is not about fixing the issues, but first about clarifying what they
> are.
>
>
>
> or
>
> messageSelectorAndArgumentNames
> | t |
> self init: t.
> ^t
>
This one is good to warn… but we have the “unitialized var”
rule for that already.
Marcus
as for catching message sends of the kind
var = 1 + 2.
(instead of :=), yes, we can add a rule for that.
> On 28 Nov 2017, at 09:20, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The "Temporaries read before written” rule is implemented very in a way that
> you get
> *a
Hi,
The "Temporaries read before written” rule is implemented very in a way that
you get
*a lot* of false positives.
e.g. it treats *any* block as potentially no exectuted, so any code like
messageSelectorAndArgumentNames
| t |
self doSomething: [ t:=1 ].
^t
or
28 matches
Mail list logo