> Le 29 nov. 2017 à 00:52, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit :
>
> demarey wrote
>>> pre Pharo-5 image
>> It probably means that the command used to determine the image version
>> failed!
>
> Oh, are Pharo 4 and prior supposed to work? I figured they were just not
> intended to be supported
Yes, I'm ab
> Le 28 nov. 2017 à 21:53, Volkert a écrit :
>
>
>
> On 28.11.2017 17:33, Christophe Demarey wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>> Le 25 nov. 2017 à 21:45, Volkert a écrit :
>>>
>>> The PharoLauncher is really nice ...
>>>
>>> Is it possible to use a 64Bit VM run an Image (6.1 >)? Per default a
>>> 32b
Hi Torsten,
I think I have a fix for your problem. I opened an issue fot it:
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-launcher/issues/55.
Could you confirm if it is ok now?
> Le 28 nov. 2017 à 20:11, Torsten Bergmann a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> Launcher is a power tool and has helped many of us so fa
Hi Ben,
we have been discussing a lot this issues in discord recently (expectations
from git users, monticello users and what iceberg needs to do/show in which
case).
basically, we have a mess on terminology and some workflows needs to be
enhanced.
Now, about your observations:
a) more than
> On 28 Nov 2017, at 19:40, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> I think you forgot to give Iceberg the "src" subdirectory where all the code
> packages reside.
> When you forget to give the "Code subdirectory" in the dialog the repo points
> to the
> bencoman/libclang-pharo-bindings root
> On 28 Nov 2017, at 20:25, stephan wrote:
>
> On 28-11-17 19:40, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
>> 2c) Code subdirectory: enter "src" here !!!
>
> Do we really need that? Why would I care about that?
because you want to structure your projects as you want, and not as some tool
(ours or other
> On 28 Nov 2017, at 22:08, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
>
> You do not have to use "src" or "repository" - you can store your packages
> directly in the root if you
> like. You are free to choose. But over time it can "bloat" the topmost level
> of your project with the
> Smalltalk packages fol
> On 29 Nov 2017, at 06:51, Ben Coman wrote:
>
> On 29 November 2017 at 02:40, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> I think you forgot to give Iceberg the "src" subdirectory where all the code
>> packages reside.
>
> Not such much forgot and not being aware of the impact of that field :
> On 29 Nov 2017, at 07:19, Ben Coman wrote:
>
> On 29 November 2017 at 07:50, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>> Stephan Eggermont-3 wrote
2c) Code subdirectory: enter "src" here !!!
>>> Do we really need that? Why would I care about that?
>>
>> BTW in latest Iceberg this is automatically
On 28-11-17 22:08, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
Having the code directly in the root is possible but not a good style
or to be recommended - because often projects include more than just
the source code and over time include more and more things like docu
or other.
Thanks for the explanation for wh
> On 29 Nov 2017, at 10:41, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
>
> The problem is in the wrong Metacello version in Pharo 6.1 that has no proper
> Tonel support. It should be fixed with the next Iceberg update in Pharo 6.1.
not really.
it should be fixed with the next *metacello* update in Pharo 6.1 ;)
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #347 was: SUCCESS.
The Pull Request #559 was integrated:
"20777-Fix-instVarAt-instVarAt-put-comment"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/559
Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20777
Build U
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #348 was: SUCCESS.
The Pull Request #562 was integrated:
"20783-upload-temporary-building-files-into-a-separate-repository"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/562
Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.co
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #349 was: SUCCESS.
The Pull Request #563 was integrated:
"-20785/Fix-the-names-of-uploaded-bootstrap-zip-files"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/563
Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20
60522
-
20339 Pharo6 test runs for CI fail with strange error in
ClassRenameFixTest>>#testRenameClassUsingClass
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20339
20279 AST-Core ASTCache not cleaned
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20279
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #350 was: SUCCESS.
The Pull Request #561 was integrated:
"20782-CompiledCode-misses-an-abstract-sourcePointer-method"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/561
Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/ca
Unfortunately this fix did not work. Details are described in
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-launcher/issues/55
Meanwhile I fixed it in an own commit: PharoLauncher-Core-TorstenBergmann.146
Launcher is now able to give the filter pattern not as global regex but now
specific to the ve
Ben Coman wrote
> That is cool to automate that, but these names seem a bit generic to
> take ownership across all domains in random projects.
I may have explained poorly. It merely guesses a default value in the repo
creation form. One is free to change manually as always if needed.
-
Chee
demarey wrote
> Yes, I'm able to run pharo 1.4 images.
Hmm, when I tried to launch a 1.4 image, it hung forever while "Determining
image version". I interrupted and manually run the command on the terminal:
"/Users/sean/Documents/Pharo/vms/private/6505/Pharo.app/Contents/MacOS/Pharo"
--headles
Hi,
We will do the switch to the new server tomorrow, Nov 30.
-> for people downloading, there should be no service intererruption
-> For *uploaders* (mostly CI jobs), you need new SSH credentials.
This means some upload jobs might break, but they will be easy
to fix
-> Uploading humans
Maybe a good occasion to fix opensmalltalk-vm :)
i.e.
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/OpenSmalltalk/vm/branch/Cog/job/h8la5cg9fi2t3l2s
/cygdrive/c/projects/vm/deploy/pharo
%CYG_ROOT%\bin\bash -lc "cd $APPVEYOR_BUILD_FOLDER/deploy/pharo; exec
0:
> Hi,
>
> We will do the switch to the new server t
demarey wrote
> Maybe it could be related to this bug:
> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-launcher/issues/52
It is a different bug in the same behavior.
The easy workaround is to manually create a pharo.version file for the
offending image.
As to the bug…
The immediate problem turned ou
I liked the launcher a lot, but It took me a while to get a version working
out-of-the-box on Ubuntu.
It's not available with the VM on the /download page for Linux. My
preferred choice would be the PPA anyway, as I like to keep stuff under APT
control, but I had to dig a lot to find a sources.lis
23 matches
Mail list logo