Hi Doru,
I understand your argument and I have heard it for years as to the reason
not to make a programming language as good as what we have known how to do
since the 1970s. I really don't have a very big dog in this fight (meaning
that I don't care all that much whether these features end up in
Let me add some more motivation and background for the discussion. I
responded to stephar...@free.fr questions by mail yesterday but it didn't
wind up on the forum. Sorry about that.
http://www.erights.org/elang/quasi/overview.html
Provides very good background for quasi-liberals. I believe this
The ES6 design is sound and if you are in a hurry to get the capability it
is a great way to go. Once you start using it and get a taste for
quasi-literal little languages you will find that you want more.
Having a quasi-literal that let's you name the little language to parse you
open a very int
I realize this is a few years old but I wanted to give an update on my quest
for quasi-literals. I did a complete quasi-literal framework for Java when
I moved over to Oracle Labs. It used the annotation compiler + a few tweeks
to the scanner and parser. You could extend the name space of the
qu
