Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [ANN] OSSubprocess first milestone

2016-01-15 Thread Mariano Martinez Peck
> > > Quick feedback: > > - the API seems great > - thank you very much for the documentation > Thanks! > - I wonder why you pass strings for stdout and stderr instead of streams > In which part exactly? In the method like #runAndWaitOnExitDo: ? if that was the question, then I simply thought

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [ANN] OSSubprocess first milestone

2016-01-15 Thread Johan Fabry
That looks very cool to me, it would have come quite in handy for some project that I did last year ;-) > On Jan 15, 2016, at 13:13, Mariano Martinez Peck > wrote: > > Luc, Damien, et all. > > I implemented the kind of API Luc suggested, which was a great idea. I took

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [ANN] OSSubprocess first milestone

2016-01-15 Thread Mariano Martinez Peck
Luc, Damien, et all. I implemented the kind of API Luc suggested, which was a great idea. I took also his API to answer Damien question of could we do a "tail -f" example. So I made a little example where I run "tail -f system.log" and I keep a Playground updated with the stdout :) Here is the

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [ANN] OSSubprocess first milestone

2016-01-14 Thread Damien Cassou
On January 14, 2016 7:33:56 PM GMT+01:00, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >Dear all, > >I am happy to tell you I have a first prototype of the tool for >executing >OS processes: > >https://github.com/marianopeck/OSSubprocess > > As I said many times, the main idea was to be