Well did we lived perfectly with it over last year?
yes -> 40
no -> 30
> >
> > Because changing Morphic now sounds a bit shaky to me :)
> That's why I'm asking for a lot of input. But it is a bug. And I think this
> slice version is very unlikely to break anything - 2 lines cha
I will have a look tomorrow :)
(right now, with the jet lag and the very long flight, I do not trust my brain
:) )
Ben
On 01 Feb 2014, at 23:07, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2014, at 5:04 PM, "Benjamin Van Ryseghem-2 [via Smalltalk]"
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Do we put in in 3.0?
On Feb 1, 2014, at 5:04 PM, "Benjamin Van Ryseghem-2 [via Smalltalk]"
wrote:
> Do we put in in 3.0?
>
> Because changing Morphic now sounds a bit shaky to me :)
That's why I'm asking for a lot of input. But it is a bug. And I think this
slice version is very unlikely to break anything - 2 lines
Do we put in in 3.0?
Because changing Morphic now sounds a bit shaky to me :)
Ben
On 01 Feb 2014, at 22:55, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> Sean P. DeNigris wrote
>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?12737
>
> I did a safer fix which is much less likely to break other things and still
> fixes t
Sean P. DeNigris wrote
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?12737
I did a safer fix which is much less likely to break other things and still
fixes the problem. Two people looked at it and the monkey validated it.
Should I "Fix to include" or would a core dev like to have a quick look
first. I'
thanks
this is indeed nice to be able to spot the one we viewed too.
On 30 Jan 2014, at 13:25, b...@openinworld.com wrote:
> Stef, A little different than you asked for, but I find the following
> combination useful when I'm trying to find a case that I recently viewed that
> was opened by so
Stef, A little different than you asked for, but I find the following
combination useful when I'm trying to find a case that I recently
viewed that was opened by someone else:
* Viewed by me - Show only cases I have viewed before
* Sort By - Last viewed by me (Reverse)
cheers -ben
Benjamin w
On 29 Jan 2014, at 22:12, Benjamin wrote:
> Filters > My case s(2nd item)
Thanks! I found using the customize and I started to review my bug entries and
close some of them.
I will check the list because I remember that I totally puzzled by the behavior
I got.
>
> Ben
>
> On 29 Jan 2014, a
Filters > My case s(2nd item)
Ben
On 29 Jan 2014, at 18:05, Pharo4Stef wrote:
> Thanks
> It reminds a really strange bug I got showing that there were hidden useless
> calls. but I cannot find if I entered an entry.
> Any idea how I can find the entries that I added to fogbogz
>
> Setf
> On
Thanks
It reminds a really strange bug I got showing that there were hidden useless
calls. but I cannot find if I entered an entry.
Any idea how I can find the entries that I added to fogbogz
Setf
On 29 Jan 2014, at 02:47, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?12737
>
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?12737
DoIt:
Morph new
on: #mouseUp send: #inspect to: 1;
openInWorld.
Two inspectors will appear.
Fix in inbox:
SLICE-Issue-12737-Morph-sends-mouseUp-twice-to-handlers-SeanDeNigris.1
Please review. It definitely fixes the problem, but it fiddl
11 matches
Mail list logo
