Re: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] New version of Mocketry 3.0

2016-06-13 Thread Damien Pollet
Hello guys, a feature idea/request… This weekend I was binge-watching talks from Ruby conferences, by Sandi Metz and Katrina Owen on OO design, refactoring, and testing. Highly recommended, and at least Sandi is an experienced smalltalker. See for instance RailsConf 2016 - Succession by Katrina Ow

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] New version of Mocketry 3.0

2016-04-20 Thread Tudor Girba
Thank you! Doru > On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:35 AM, Denis Kudriashov wrote: > > > 2016-04-20 2:27 GMT+02:00 Sean P. DeNigris : > Tudor Girba-2 wrote > > It is your prerogative :), but “should got" sounds broken :(. > > Sounds like fingernails on a chalkboard IMH-native-english-speaker-O ;) > >

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] New version of Mocketry 3.0

2016-04-20 Thread Denis Kudriashov
2016-04-20 2:27 GMT+02:00 Sean P. DeNigris : > Tudor Girba-2 wrote > > It is your prerogative :), but “should got" sounds broken :(. > > Sounds like fingernails on a chalkboard IMH-native-english-speaker-O ;) > Ok. I open new thread about names

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] New version of Mocketry 3.0

2016-04-19 Thread stepharo
Le 19/4/16 15:46, Tudor Girba a écrit : Hi, On Apr 6, 2016, at 6:13 AM, Denis Kudriashov wrote: 2016-04-06 14:51 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba : Just the English does not sound quite well for statements like: mock should got someMessage mock should not got anotherMessage. I know

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] New version of Mocketry 3.0

2016-04-19 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
Tudor Girba-2 wrote > It is your prerogative :), but “should got" sounds broken :(. Sounds like fingernails on a chalkboard IMH-native-english-speaker-O ;) - Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Ann-New-version-of-Mocketry-3-0-tp4888628p4890904.html Sent from

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] New version of Mocketry 3.0

2016-04-19 Thread Tudor Girba
Hi, > On Apr 6, 2016, at 6:13 AM, Denis Kudriashov wrote: > > > 2016-04-06 14:51 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba : > Just the English does not sound quite well for statements like: > mock should got someMessage > mock should not got anotherMessage. > > I know that there was a long discus

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] New version of Mocketry 3.0

2016-04-06 Thread Denis Kudriashov
2016-04-06 14:51 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba : > Just the English does not sound quite well for statements like: > mock should got someMessage > mock should not got anotherMessage. > > I know that there was a long discussion about naming these. I do not > remember the outcome, but still

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] New version of Mocketry 3.0

2016-04-06 Thread Tudor Girba
Hi, Nice work! Just the English does not sound quite well for statements like: mock should got someMessage mock should not got anotherMessage. I know that there was a long discussion about naming these. I do not remember the outcome, but still I think other alternatives would be

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Ann] New version of Mocketry 3.0

2016-04-06 Thread Denis Kudriashov
And I add chapters in PharoInProgress 2016-04-06 14:29 GMT+02:00 Denis Kudriashov : > I am glad to present simplest mocks for Pharo. > In this version Mocketry is dramatically improved and changed. I try to > provide most simple way to stub any message to any object and to verify any > occurred

[Pharo-dev] [Ann] New version of Mocketry 3.0

2016-04-06 Thread Denis Kudriashov
I am glad to present simplest mocks for Pharo. In this version Mocketry is dramatically improved and changed. I try to provide most simple way to stub any message to any object and to verify any occurred behaviour. You can read full details in my blog http://dionisiydk.blogspot.fr/2016/04/new-ver