Hello guys, a feature idea/request…
This weekend I was binge-watching talks from Ruby conferences, by Sandi
Metz and Katrina Owen on OO design, refactoring, and testing.
Highly recommended, and at least Sandi is an experienced smalltalker.
See for instance RailsConf 2016 - Succession by Katrina Ow
Thank you!
Doru
> On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:35 AM, Denis Kudriashov wrote:
>
>
> 2016-04-20 2:27 GMT+02:00 Sean P. DeNigris :
> Tudor Girba-2 wrote
> > It is your prerogative :), but “should got" sounds broken :(.
>
> Sounds like fingernails on a chalkboard IMH-native-english-speaker-O ;)
>
>
2016-04-20 2:27 GMT+02:00 Sean P. DeNigris :
> Tudor Girba-2 wrote
> > It is your prerogative :), but “should got" sounds broken :(.
>
> Sounds like fingernails on a chalkboard IMH-native-english-speaker-O ;)
>
Ok. I open new thread about names
Le 19/4/16 15:46, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Hi,
On Apr 6, 2016, at 6:13 AM, Denis Kudriashov wrote:
2016-04-06 14:51 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba :
Just the English does not sound quite well for statements like:
mock should got someMessage
mock should not got anotherMessage.
I know
Tudor Girba-2 wrote
> It is your prerogative :), but “should got" sounds broken :(.
Sounds like fingernails on a chalkboard IMH-native-english-speaker-O ;)
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Ann-New-version-of-Mocketry-3-0-tp4888628p4890904.html
Sent from
Hi,
> On Apr 6, 2016, at 6:13 AM, Denis Kudriashov wrote:
>
>
> 2016-04-06 14:51 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba :
> Just the English does not sound quite well for statements like:
> mock should got someMessage
> mock should not got anotherMessage.
>
> I know that there was a long discus
2016-04-06 14:51 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba :
> Just the English does not sound quite well for statements like:
> mock should got someMessage
> mock should not got anotherMessage.
>
> I know that there was a long discussion about naming these. I do not
> remember the outcome, but still
Hi,
Nice work!
Just the English does not sound quite well for statements like:
mock should got someMessage
mock should not got anotherMessage.
I know that there was a long discussion about naming these. I do not remember
the outcome, but still I think other alternatives would be
And I add chapters in PharoInProgress
2016-04-06 14:29 GMT+02:00 Denis Kudriashov :
> I am glad to present simplest mocks for Pharo.
> In this version Mocketry is dramatically improved and changed. I try to
> provide most simple way to stub any message to any object and to verify any
> occurred
I am glad to present simplest mocks for Pharo.
In this version Mocketry is dramatically improved and changed. I try to
provide most simple way to stub any message to any object and to verify any
occurred behaviour.
You can read full details in my blog
http://dionisiydk.blogspot.fr/2016/04/new-ver
10 matches
Mail list logo