Re: [Pharo-dev] Are #explorerContents and #hasContentsInExplorer obsolete ?

2013-12-30 Thread Marcus Denker
On 28 Dec 2013, at 13:36, Tudor Girba tu...@tudorgirba.com wrote: Thanks for raising this :). I now added a simple implementation in the GTInspector to have Pointers available for all objects. Perhaps it is overdoing it to have it by default on all objects, but it was cheap to implement

Re: [Pharo-dev] Are #explorerContents and #hasContentsInExplorer obsolete ?

2013-12-30 Thread Tudor Girba
I know. This is why I am arguing that we should make the optional tools not optional. It would be a more profitable approach :). Cheers, Doru On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.frwrote: On 28 Dec 2013, at 13:36, Tudor Girba tu...@tudorgirba.com wrote:

Re: [Pharo-dev] Are #explorerContents and #hasContentsInExplorer obsolete ?

2013-12-25 Thread Marcus Denker
On 21 Dec 2013, at 15:03, Sven Van Caekenberghe s...@stfx.eu wrote: Hi, It seems that #explorerContents and #hasContentsInExplorer are no longer used. Implementing a new Eye inspector with #addSpecialFields: seems to affect both the Inspector view as well as the Tree Inspector. So,

Re: [Pharo-dev] Are #explorerContents and #hasContentsInExplorer obsolete ?

2013-12-24 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
I do not know but we should log that somewhere. Stef On 21 Dec 2013, at 15:03, Sven Van Caekenberghe s...@stfx.eu wrote: Hi, It seems that #explorerContents and #hasContentsInExplorer are no longer used. Implementing a new Eye inspector with #addSpecialFields: seems to affect both the