Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
\That
wasn't a report of a bug. It was just tracking my progress as I
tried to understand it - but point taken - it is easier for reviewers
if there is not too much irrelevant details.
btw, What do you think about Finder > Search > Source being
inclusiv
> \That wasn't a report of a bug. It was just tracking my progress as I tried
> to understand it - but point taken - it is easier for reviewers if there is
> not too much irrelevant details.
> btw, What do you think about Finder > Search > Source being inclusive of
> class comments?
Yes it
Marcus Denker wrote:
On 17 Dec 2013, at 16:24, b...@openinworld.com wrote:
Marcus Denker wrote:
This is a nice issue for someone to do that wants to start with something simple:
12063 ConfigurationBrowser window about message is wrong (and dated)
https://pharo.fo
On 17 Dec 2013, at 16:24, b...@openinworld.com wrote:
> Marcus Denker wrote:
>> This is a nice issue for someone to do that wants to start with something
>> simple:
>>
>> 12063 ConfigurationBrowser window about message is wrong (and dated)
>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12063
>>
>>
b...@openinworld.com wrote:
Marcus Denker wrote:
This is a nice issue for someone to do that wants to start with
something simple:
12063 ConfigurationBrowser window about message is wrong (and dated)
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12063
I'll have a go at it, but I'd like some wid
Marcus Denker wrote:
This is a nice issue for someone to do that wants to start with something
simple:
12063 ConfigurationBrowser window about message is wrong (and dated)
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12063
I'll have a go at it, but I'd like some wider discussion as its turn
This is a nice issue for someone to do that wants to start with something
simple:
12063 ConfigurationBrowser window about message is wrong (and dated)
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12063