>
> With respect to Seaside (and its cross-platform-ness), this is probably a
> good decision, for now.
>
> But it is fundamentally unfair to call this an arbitrary unimportant change
> meant to annoy people. On the contrary ! I even think that there are too many
> methods in TAssertable and t
tx!
On Oct 24, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
> From the comments I think we can agree that it is a better to have a lint rule
> instead of breaking things the way it was introduced by the original issue
> #11876.
>
> I therefore opened an issue
>
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f
>>>
>>
>> yes, people are not willing to change code all the time…
>
> We are willing to change the code where there is a clear benefit. For example
> it's hard to argue that the new filesystem is an improvement over
> FileDirectory. We have a partically working Spec based UI for the servers.
On 24 Oct 2013, at 13:55, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
> From the comments I think we can agree that it is a better to have a lint rule
> instead of breaking things the way it was introduced by the original issue
> #11876.
>
> I therefore opened an issue
>
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/
From the comments I think we can agree that it is a better to have a lint rule
instead of breaking things the way it was introduced by the original issue #11876.
I therefore opened an issue
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11989/shouldnt-raise-Error-from-issue-11876-is-too-offensive
and
