Re: [Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

By the way, we can add a rule that checks if a package has a comment. Because for example I had no idea that you can comment packages. > On 24 May 2016, at 14:37, Cyril Ferlicot Delbecque > wrote: > > > > On 24/05/2016 13:19, Christophe Demarey wrote: >> >>> Le 24

Re: [Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

On 24/05/2016 13:19, Christophe Demarey wrote: > >> Le 24 mai 2016 à 10:08, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit : >> >> there is a space: same as class comment now. > > > only for the class comment, not for other package metadata > Maybe the package comment can be at the place

Re: [Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

> On 24 May 2016, at 10:09, Cyril Ferlicot Delbecque > wrote: > > > > On 24/05/2016 07:44, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> >> The missing class comments are totally unacceptable, we should refuse these. >> > > +1 > > It is really frustrating to take free

Re: [Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

> On 24 May 2016, at 04:00, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > Doing some exploring... BlueInk, Chroma, Flashback, Renraku - all packages > with no class comments. How would a new user discover what these are? How comes that Renraku has no class comments?

Re: [Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

> On 24 May 2016, at 13:19, Christophe Demarey > wrote: > > >> Le 24 mai 2016 à 10:08, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit : >> >> there is a space: same as class comment now. > > > only for the class comment, not for other package metadata you

Re: [Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

> Le 24 mai 2016 à 10:08, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit : > > there is a space: same as class comment now. only for the class comment, not for other package metadata

Re: [Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

there is a space: same as class comment now. > On 24 May 2016, at 10:00, Christophe Demarey > wrote: > > I already have support for package comments with cargo (including ui) using > the package manifest. In fact, it is more. I have support for package >

Re: [Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

On 24/05/2016 07:44, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > The missing class comments are totally unacceptable, we should refuse these. > +1 It is really frustrating to take free time to improve the comments of the current classes and to see that there is dozens of classes without comment

Re: [Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

On 24/05/2016 04:00, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > Doing some exploring... BlueInk, Chroma, Flashback, Renraku - all packages > with no class comments. How would a new user discover what these are? > BlueInk is the new configurable formatter. In Chroma there is only one classe with a class comment.

Re: [Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

Le 24/5/16 à 08:21, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit : On 24 May 2016, at 08:05, stepharo wrote: When people use a configuration and add a description hovering over the package show you the description and this helps for real. yes, this is super cool… but I would like the

Re: [Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

> On 24 May 2016, at 08:05, stepharo wrote: > > When people use a configuration and add a description > > hovering over the package show you the description and this helps for real. yes, this is super cool… but I would like the possibility to toggle a “comment” for packages

Re: [Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

> On 24 May 2016, at 04:00, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > Also, not new to Pharo 5.0, but thinking as a new user... Nautilus presents > the system as an overwhelming mess of top level packages. I guess this is > because we're showing packages, which are a dependency/SCM

Re: [Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

When people use a configuration and add a description hovering over the package show you the description and this helps for real. Stef Le 24/5/16 à 04:00, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit : Doing some exploring... BlueInk, Chroma, Flashback, Renraku - all packages with no class comments. How would a

Re: [Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

> On 24 May 2016, at 07:41, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > >> On 24 May 2016, at 03:37, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: >> >> Sean P. DeNigris wrote >>> Is there a more complete description than the announcement? >> >> I should've mentioned that I did see the

Re: [Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

> On 24 May 2016, at 04:00, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > Doing some exploring... BlueInk, Chroma, Flashback, Renraku - all packages > with no class comments. The missing class comments are totally unacceptable, we should refuse these. Apart from BlueInk (a code

Re: [Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

> On 24 May 2016, at 03:37, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > Sean P. DeNigris wrote >> Is there a more complete description than the announcement? > > I should've mentioned that I did see the link to the bugtracker, but I'm > looking for some middle ground between the 5

Re: [Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

Doing some exploring... BlueInk, Chroma, Flashback, Renraku - all packages with no class comments. How would a new user discover what these are? Also, not new to Pharo 5.0, but thinking as a new user... Nautilus presents the system as an overwhelming mess of top level packages. I guess this is

Re: [Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

Sean P. DeNigris wrote > Is there a more complete description than the announcement? I should've mentioned that I did see the link to the bugtracker, but I'm looking for some middle ground between the 5 bullet points in the announcement and the 2400+ issues tagged for Pharo 5.0 - Cheers,

[Pharo-dev] What's new in Pharo 5.0

Is there a more complete description than the announcement? I've been dutifully following the mailing lists, but don't feel like I have a real handle on what the new features are and why they matter. Thanks! - Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: