Re: [Pharo-dev] getting the history of a method?

Alex from memory an activeRing definition is always returning the current method definition. aspassive I guess is creating one that represents a method at a certain point. and yes we should continue to improving ring. Hi! I have the following: Object subclass: #A. A compile: 'foo ^ 5'. A c

Re: [Pharo-dev] getting the history of a method?

2015-06-21 2:47 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Bergel : > Hi! > > I have the following: > > Object subclass: #A. > A compile: 'foo ^ 5'. > A compile: 'foo ^ 10'. > > (A >> #foo) asHistoricalRingDefinition > > But I have no idea how I can get the two time stamps of A>>foo and the two > source code? > I think

[Pharo-dev] getting the history of a method?

Hi! I have the following: Object subclass: #A. A compile: 'foo ^ 5'. A compile: 'foo ^ 10'. (A >> #foo) asHistoricalRingDefinition But I have no idea how I can get the two time stamps of A>>foo and the two source code? I cannot figure out what is the difference between asPassiveRingDefinition