> g
>
> one of this days we should write the “metacello compendium”, and create
> agreements in ways to do things :P
+ 1
I would love to have a list of metacello patterns.
Stef
>
>
>
> On 05 Jan 2014, at 12:41, Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>> I added a development version to point to the b
On 05 Jan 2014, at 12:51, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Esteban Lorenzano
> wrote:
> anyway, I added a 3.2 version, so I can reference it in my projects
>
> Thanks.
>
> (is *really* not good to reference to a baseline of an external project in
> your own
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
> anyway, I added a 3.2 version, so I can reference it in my projects
>
Thanks.
> (is *really* not good to reference to a baseline of an external project in
> your own… that just leads to a lot of pain :)
>
Not true. Moose is deve
anyway, I added a 3.2 version, so I can reference it in my projects (is
*really* not good to reference to a baseline of an external project in your
own… that just leads to a lot of pain :)
Esteban
On 05 Jan 2014, at 12:42, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
> g
>
> one of this days we should writ
g
one of this days we should write the “metacello compendium”, and create
agreements in ways to do things :P
On 05 Jan 2014, at 12:41, Tudor Girba wrote:
> I added a development version to point to the baseline :)
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Esteban Loren
I added a development version to point to the baseline :)
Cheers,
Doru
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
> and you added a baseline 3.2 but not a version (not cool, doru, not cool :)
>
> On 05 Jan 2014, at 12:07, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
>
> MAElementRow was still depen
and you added a baseline 3.2 but not a version (not cool, doru, not cool :)
On 05 Jan 2014, at 12:07, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
> MAElementRow was still depending on RectangleMorph.
> But it was more a problem of the #stable release: it was not updated.
>
> Esteban
>
> On 05 Jan 2014, at 11:4
MAElementRow was still depending on RectangleMorph.
But it was more a problem of the #stable release: it was not updated.
Esteban
On 05 Jan 2014, at 11:42, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Hi Esteban,
>
> I fixed this issue in Magritte-Morph a long time ago when we ported Moose to
> Pharo 3.0. What exa
Hi Esteban,
I fixed this issue in Magritte-Morph a long time ago when we ported Moose
to Pharo 3.0. What exactly is the issue?
Cheers,
Doru
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
>
> On 05 Jan 2014, at 11:33, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
> >
> > On 05 Jan 2014, at 11:30, Esteba
On 05 Jan 2014, at 11:33, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
> On 05 Jan 2014, at 11:30, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
>
>> … is not there anymore.
>> And Magritte-Morph requires it :(
>>
>> my guess: I was another victim of Stef compulsion of giving us a better and
>> cleaning system :)
>>
>
> The thing
On 05 Jan 2014, at 11:30, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
> … is not there anymore.
> And Magritte-Morph requires it :(
>
> my guess: I was another victim of Stef compulsion of giving us a better and
> cleaning system :)
>
The thing was that it had no state nor behaviour different to Morph… everyw
… is not there anymore.
And Magritte-Morph requires it :(
my guess: I was another victim of Stef compulsion of giving us a better and
cleaning system :)
But it should be replaced by what?
Esteban
12 matches
Mail list logo
