Hi David,
yes, that is unfortunate that we chose the same name around the same
time and both projects are already well known enough to not easily
switch names.
But, as others already said, the projects are sufficiently different
to not be confused easily.
Maybe we could cross-link on the sites?
Confirmed. I created http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443
Not sure how it is possible that this IdentitySet can get into that
state. Any ideas?
Adrian
On Jan 15, 2009, at 11:01 , Damien Cassou wrote:
Hi,
if you load the latest version of Collection package in PharoInbox and
No we check and this is strange.
What is the hash of a trait?
Stef
On Jan 15, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
Confirmed. I created http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=443
Not sure how it is possible that this IdentitySet can get into that
state. Any ideas?
Adrian
On
we keep it :)
yes, that is unfortunate that we chose the same name around the same
time and both projects are already well known enough to not easily
switch names.
But, as others already said, the projects are sufficiently different
to not be confused easily.
Maybe we could cross-link on
Damien Cassou wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Michael Rueger m.rue...@acm.org wrote:
yes, that is unfortunate that we chose the same name around the same
time and both projects are already well known enough to not easily
switch names.
But, as others already said, the projects are
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
we keep it :)
I think Damien was referring to the cross link :-)
Michael
yes, that is unfortunate that we chose the same name around the same
time and both projects are already well known enough to not easily
switch names.
But, as others already said, the projects
we keep it :)
I think Damien was referring to the cross link :-)
no sure :)
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
I wish both projects a big success, so everyone will aware of both of
them and no more confused. :)
2009/1/15 Michael Rueger m.rue...@acm.org:
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
we keep it :)
I think Damien was referring to the cross link :-)
Michael
yes, that is unfortunate that we chose the same
On Jan 15, 2009, at 12:41 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
No we check and this is strange.
What is the hash of a trait?
The hash of traits is not related to the problem. The problem is that
classes show up multiple times in IdentitySets.
I found the cause (its a bit complicated to explain
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Adrian Lienhard a...@netstyle.ch wrote:
The hash of traits is not related to the problem. The problem is that
classes show up multiple times in IdentitySets.
I found the cause (its a bit complicated to explain because related to
the ClassBuilder and become:).
On Jan 15, 2009, at 15:43 , Damien Cassou wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Adrian Lienhard a...@netstyle.ch
wrote:
The hash of traits is not related to the problem. The problem is that
classes show up multiple times in IdentitySets.
I found the cause (its a bit complicated to
ok, I'll see what I can do...
BTW, why is this so pressing now? This bug has existed for four years.
Adrian
On Jan 15, 2009, at 18:11 , Damien Cassou wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Adrian Lienhard a...@netstyle.ch
wrote:
No. This will remove the duplicates, but in case traits are
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Adrian Lienhard a...@netstyle.ch wrote:
BTW, why is this so pressing now? This bug has existed for four years.
We are writing an article and we have lots of metrics automatically
calculated (and the LaTeX tables are also automatically generated).
Since the
Hi all
with jannik we published two slice in the inbox to clean some
dependencies:
One remove onwerOfThatClassIs:orA:
the other one merge
AlignementMorphBob1 into AlignementMorph
remove AlignmentMorphBob1
remove ThreadProjectNavigator
and damage a bit more
Ok, what I'm going to do here is push out a 3.8.21 later today.
I will revert to the old behaviour, however this will have a
info.plist flag that allows you choose the new mmap performance since
it does gain a few hundred milliseconds of time on a launch.
The new behaviour has I believe these
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
stephane.duca...@inria.fr wrote:
remove AlignmentMorphBob1
YES, a dream come true ;-)
michael
___
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
:)
Jannik understood today why we forked :) and why we were really
thinking that
people are not serious when they want to keep squeak as it was.
We cannot attract all the smart guys we want with a system like that.
So we are improving :)
This is sad because there are so much fun stuff. But
Stef,
There is nothing to stop us and others from having fun on top of a
clean system with a user interface that can meet the expectations of
users, paying and otherwise. The cleanup is long overdue and very much
starting to show.
Bill
Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
University of Florida
2009/1/15 Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr:
:)
Jannik understood today why we forked :) and why we were really
thinking that
people are not serious when they want to keep squeak as it was.
We cannot attract all the smart guys we want with a system like that.
So we are improving :)
testAsCommaString
{OrderedCollection new. Set new.} do:
[ :coll |
self assert: coll asCommaString = ''.
coll add: 1.
self assert: coll asCommaString = '1'.
coll add: 2; add: 3.
self assert:
20 matches
Mail list logo
