On Jan 18, 2012, at 9:30 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
> On 18 January 2012 21:15, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>> Ok I see I should select the variable
>> but if I select the class I do not need to see superclass variables because
>> I should not been able to
>> push them.
>
> I find it convenient to b
14288
-
- Issue 5163: Bug in #pointsTo:
Thanks Mariano Martinez-Peck, Levente Uzonyi and Henrik Johansen
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5163
- Issue 5116: Reintroduce the new MethodDictionary >> rehash since it is working
Thanks Mariano Martinez-Peck
>> On 18 January 2012 21:15, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>> Ok I see I should select the variable
>>> but if I select the class I do not need to see superclass variables because
>>> I should not been able to
>>> push them.
>>
>> I find it convenient to be able to push up any variable in the
>> hiera
Excellent!
Mariano is a bull (like me) and this is good that other people like henrik
guides us :).
Stef
>
>>
>> - Issue 5005:#cleanUpForRelease is broken: MessageNotUnderstood:
>> ByteSymbol>>run:with:in:. Thanks Henrik and Mariano.
>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail
stef...there is still a category 'AST-Semantic' which has:
AnObsoleteRBProgramNodeVisitor subclass: #RBSemanticAnnotator
instanceVariableNames: 'scope'
classVariableNames: ''
poolDictionaries: ''
category: 'AST-Semantic'
cheers
--
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
Thanks
This is really strange because this means that the unload does not work well :)
On Jan 19, 2012, at 11:26 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
> stef...there is still a category 'AST-Semantic' which has:
>
> AnObsoleteRBProgramNodeVisitor subclass: #RBSemanticAnnotator
> instanceVariab
I am currently doing a small refactoring of FSFilesystem.
Does anybody need explicitly FSLocator?
Otherwise I'd vouch for removing it..
best
cami
On Jan 19, 2012, at 2:05 41PM, Camillo Bruni wrote:
> I am currently doing a small refactoring of FSFilesystem.
> Does anybody need explicitly FSLocator?
>
> Otherwise I'd vouch for removing it..
>
>
> best
> cami
>
Why?
Seems kinda nice to me to be able to specify locations relative to
i
On 2012-01-19, at 14:21, Henrik Johansen wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2012, at 2:05 41PM, Camillo Bruni wrote:
>> I am currently doing a small refactoring of FSFilesystem.
>> Does anybody need explicitly FSLocator?
>>
>> Otherwise I'd vouch for removing it..
>>
>>
>> best
>> cami
>>
> Why?
>
> Seems
On 27 December 2011 18:39, Eliot Miranda wrote:
> Hi Phillipe,
>
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
>>
>> On 27.12.2011 19:18, Eliot Miranda wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Phillipe,
>>>
>>> what does ldd answer for the squeak vm?
>>
>>
>> $ldd coglinux/lib/squeak/4.0-2515/squeak
Hi Nahuel,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Nahuel Garbezza wrote:
> On 27 December 2011 18:39, Eliot Miranda wrote:
> > Hi Phillipe,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Philippe Marschall
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 27.12.2011 19:18, Eliot Miranda wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Phillipe,
> >>>
> >>>
> Thanks. But what's the corresponding /usr/lib? e.g. is there a
> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu? In this context LD_LIBRARY_PATH needs to contain a
> /lib and a /usr/lib.
>
Yes, /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/ exists. As it worked, I thought it was
not necessary.
Nahuel
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Nahuel Garbezza wrote:
> > Thanks. But what's the corresponding /usr/lib? e.g. is there a
> > /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu? In this context LD_LIBRARY_PATH needs to
> contain a
> > /lib and a /usr/lib.
> >
>
> Yes, /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/ exists. As it worked, I tho
Most probably know this, but just in case, recent versions of Linux
distributions provide a more modular way to control the library path via the
/etc/ld.so.conf.d/ directory.
For example I normally add path to oracle libraries by adding a file
/etc/ld.so.conf.d/oracle-11.1-x86_64.conf with just
I always directly reference FSLocator. Of course I can refactor my code
if you come with a better solution than a FSLocator almost identical
than FSReference...
On 19/01/12 08:01, Camillo Bruni wrote:
On 2012-01-19, at 14:21, Henrik Johansen wrote:
On Jan 19, 2012, at 2:05 41PM, Camillo Bruni
Hi Bernat,
This is what is interesting me too, actually two things, OpenID 2.0 and
OAuth 2.0, on top of Swazoo or at least Sport to be portable. I also
planned to look at CloudFork first ...
Best regards
Janko
S, Bernat Romagosa piše:
> Hi list,
>
> We need to log a user into an application (no
Apparently there was a glError that I wasn't catching, so the disk
address issue has gone away: the Baloon3D plugin was logging errors I
didn't catch.
However, I'm not sure how to efficiently blit GUI updates to the gl
texture, so suggestions appreciated.
Looking at the Squeak3D.log file, it
On 1/17/2012 2:57 PM, Frank Shearar wrote:
Emacs + SLIME = image-based, interactive development. As image-based
as you'd like, at least. Eclipse + Cusp = image-based development:
you're connecting to a running Common Lisp image, which you can
snapshot and restore any time you like (just like ch
On 1/18/2012 12:19 AM, Friedrich Dominicus wrote:
Jimmie Houchin writes:
I am all for improving our editing experience. But I want it in my
image and not in Emacs/vi. I would rather see our world improved than
to see it require an external editor which sees code as text, not
objects, where dif
19 matches
Mail list logo
