Do you need it for a model or for drawing?
Because for drawing there is
LineMorph
stef
I went to use a Line today and found it wasn't in Pharo.
Apparently this is part of the ST80-* (ST80-Paths) classes which
aren't carried over to Pharo.
So...how do I draw a line on a morph
Hi
I'm cleaning Sensor use so that we end up with a better layered system.
Now I see this method and I wonder (replacing Sensor by hand does not work.
But I do not understand why this methods has to explicitly invoke
runStepMethods… to me it looks like a broken behavior
due probably to the
yes, this looks like a bug.
But i would recompile all methods of copied class, so all these
nuances is handled.
On 12 May 2012 14:04, Mariano Martinez Peck marianop...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
stephane.duca...@inria.fr wrote:
On May 12, 2012, at
2012/5/12 Benjamin benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com:
Hello :)
Do you have opened an entry ?
Honestly, I am not a fan of this mechanism (as Marcus said, when I want
something specific, I select it from the text, then use shortcuts :) )
But I can understand you miss it.
In Nautilus,
It depends of the usage of copy...
If the purpose is to modify a class, then the copy will replace the
original in a short future, and you should better keep the
associations untouched and only change them in a final Namespace at:
className put: theClassCopy...
If the purpose is to create a new
On May 13, 2012, at 2:15 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
2012/5/12 Benjamin benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com:
Hello :)
Do you have opened an entry ?
Honestly, I am not a fan of this mechanism (as Marcus said, when I want
something specific, I select it from the text, then use shortcuts
2012/5/11 Camillo Bruni camillobr...@gmail.com:
I just checked:
- Using the old FileDirectory has the advantage that we keep the low level
entries directory = O(n^n)
- FIleSystem doesn't do that ;) = O(n^3)
we should really switch to the other, direct access primitive!
The code for
Hi,
it seems that FileBrowser/FileList is never used...
And I absolutely don't understand some design choices.
1) Having a single reference inst var for both selectedDirectory and
selectedFile : this is a bug factory, see
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5881 and
The main drawback from usability point of view: it is an implicit
feature, invisible to newbie and other out of the context.
Hilaire
On 13/05/2012 14:15, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
2012/5/12 Benjamin benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com:
Hello :)
Do you have opened an entry ?
Honestly, I am
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
stephane.duca...@inria.fr wrote:
Do you need it for a model or for drawing?
Because for drawing there is
LineMorph
stef
I'm not sure what you mean by a model. I've never been really good
with Morphic, so when I started this current
If I have a method showing in the method pane, I can right-click on
renderContentOn: and get a list of all the implementors of that
method.
What if I don't know of a class that has the renderContentOn: method?
How can I find the classes then?
===Blake===
I don't get it I think ...
You want to retrieve the classes that implements renderContentOn in the case
you do not know a method containing a call to this selector ?
Am I right ?
Ben
On May 13, 2012, at 7:51 PM, blake wrote:
If I have a method showing in the method pane, I can right-click
So, thanks to Igor Stasenko, I've managed to learn how to (sorta) use
the new NativeBoost FFI (spock). We (he) implemented a binding to a few
of the gmplib functions. gmp is the GNU Multi-Precision Library.
Here is a simple benchmark of the Pharo factorial method vs the gmplib
mpz_fac_ui()
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Benjamin
benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't get it I think ...
You want to retrieve the classes that implements renderContentOn [snip]
This is what I want. I don't want to have to find a class that
implements renderContentOn first, and then go
On 5/13/12 11:02 AM, Lawson English wrote:
[results]
Ack, I printed the times for the gmplib off by a factor of 10. However,
the ratio is still correct.
gmplib is at least 700x faster than the built-in factorial method for
10 factorial.
--
Squeak from the very start (introduction to
Hi:
I was looking for something that could visualize code coverage on the
branch/statement level.
My understanding is that the test coverage tool provide by the test runner only
tells me which methods haven't been called.
I also had a look at Hapao. First I found that the linked image was
So just find any text area (inspector, workspace, code browser )
type the selector you are looking for (here renderContentOn:)
then select the selector and do cmd+m for implementors, cmd+n for senders
It should do what you want :)
Ben
On May 13, 2012, at 8:11 PM, blake wrote:
On Sun, May 13,
Cool! Thanks!
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Benjamin
benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com wrote:
So just find any text area (inspector, workspace, code browser )
type the selector you are looking for (here renderContentOn:)
then select the selector and do cmd+m for implementors, cmd+n for
Indeed is weird. I think it has to explicitly call runStepMethods,
because it's not forking , thus taking control of the ui process, does
it make sense?
I would remove the method (and all the similar ones found in the
image, that explicitly reference Sensor and while doing true
whileTrue:[ ...],
I'll prepare one, detailing myself and Gaucho.
Fernando
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
stephane.duca...@inria.fr wrote:
Thanks Hilaire for this cool one :)
https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/30761/drgeo-teaser.pdf
I should do one for http://www.synectique.eu
There is a finder plugin for nautilus also :).
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 8:29 PM, blake dsblakewat...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool! Thanks!
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Benjamin
benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com wrote:
So just find any text area (inspector, workspace, code browser )
type
20072
-
Issue 5886: Minor fix in Nautilus
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5886
Issue 5875: Too Many Options
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5875
Issue 5833: More robust allSuperclassesIncluding:
Also cool.
As bad as I am about this stuff, one thing Pharo has WAY over Squeak
is that the options are manageable. I've found a lot just by poking
around in Pharo where the much larger menus in Squeak are
overwhelming...
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Guillermo Polito
On May 13, 2012, at 8:32 PM, Fernando Olivero wrote:
Indeed is weird. I think it has to explicitly call runStepMethods,
because it's not forking , thus taking control of the ui process, does
it make sense?
I would remove the method (and all the similar ones found in the
image, that
Stéphane Ducasse wrote
Now I see this method and I wonder (replacing Sensor by hand does not
work.
...
What do you think?
I'm reimplementing it without Sensor, integrated well with Morphic... It's
almost done... I'll try to upload tonight.
Sean
--
View this message in context:
On 13 May 2012 22:13, Sean P. DeNigris s...@clipperadams.com wrote:
Stéphane Ducasse wrote
Now I see this method and I wonder (replacing Sensor by hand does not
work.
...
What do you think?
I'm reimplementing it without Sensor, integrated well with Morphic... It's
almost done... I'll
Sean
thanks a lot.
pay attention we already did it. Check less sensor bug entry:
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5887
Stef
On May 13, 2012, at 10:13 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
Stéphane Ducasse wrote
Now I see this method and I wonder (replacing Sensor by hand
[pharo-project list added back in]
On 5/13/12 1:34 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
[10 primeSwingFactorial] timeToRun 3411 [10 factorial]
timeToRun 61219 So gmp is still 40x faster than a reasonably optimized
Smalltalk factorial... I think that's fair, because gmp is highly
optimized.
On 14 May 2012 00:03, Lawson English lengli...@cox.net wrote:
[pharo-project list added back in]
On 5/13/12 1:34 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
[10 primeSwingFactorial] timeToRun 3411 [10 factorial] timeToRun
61219 So gmp is still 40x faster than a reasonably optimized Smalltalk
Igor Stasenko wrote
You're too slow. We did it already :)
WTF!!! You guys are getting too good, lol.
One thing... The instance creation should be:
poly := PolygonMorph
vertices: { p1. p1 }
color: Color transparent
borderWidth: 2
On 14 May 2012 04:33, Sean P. DeNigris s...@clipperadams.com wrote:
Igor Stasenko wrote
You're too slow. We did it already :)
WTF!!! You guys are getting too good, lol.
One thing... The instance creation should be:
poly := PolygonMorph
vertices: { p1. p1 }
Do you guys know about this? This seems like it could fit really well with
Metacello...
http://semver.org/
Excerpt:
'I call this system Semantic Versioning. Under this scheme, version
numbers and the way they change convey meaning about the underlying code and
what has been modified from one
A few updates...
* StringdisplayProgressAt:from:to:during: has deprecated in the comment,
but is not in a deprecated category. The timestamp is 9/7/11 which puts it
either 1.2 or early 1.3, but either way, it should be removed for 2.0,
right? There is only one sender in the image, which can easily
I've noticed we use a buffet of accessors for singletons, like #default,
#instance, #current... it'd be nice to just pick one. I like #instance, but
could live with any as long as I never have to guess which one from a list
again :)
Sean
--
View this message in context:
34 matches
Mail list logo
