I trained bunch of 4 smalltalkers to push its life ahead.
It was a great piece of work, looked slick on VW and according to the
Tektronix guys, the engineers preferred it to the C++ version... they were
being asked to use.. so it was being revived when I heard last in 2005. But
Tektronix itself
awesome!!!
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Benjamin
benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello guys :)
I just wanted to show you the new feature I just finished to implement
into Nautilus: the multi methods edition
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/24369478/MultiMethods.mov
The video is
Ben
this is gorgeous :)
simply gorgeous.
This opens a lot of possibilities.
I hope you will enjoy it, and as usual if you have cool ideas, let me know ;)
of course I do :)
- I imagine that we will be able to have multiple methods not compiled
so the red border/corner should be more
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr
wrote:
Ben
this is gorgeous :)
simply gorgeous.
This opens a lot of possibilities.
I hope you will enjoy it, and as usual if you have cool ideas, let me
know ;)
of course I do :)
- I imagine that we
It looks cool !
2012/8/6 Mariano Martinez Peck marianop...@gmail.com
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
stephane.duca...@inria.fr wrote:
Ben
this is gorgeous :)
simply gorgeous.
This opens a lot of possibilities.
I hope you will enjoy it, and as usual if you have
On Aug 6, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck marianop...@gmail.com
wrote:
- I would also love different display layouts to choose: horizontal,
vertical, rows/columns, etc :)
tabs :)
looks down... :(
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/ss3.gemstone.com
no, is working again
On Aug 6, 2012, at 12:09 PM, Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com wrote:
looks down... :(
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/ss3.gemstone.com
Because the software I use for caption provide mov by default, and it was 2am :)
Moreover, I do not have a youtube account :)
Ben
On Aug 6, 2012, at 6:42 AM, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
Not able to display it on small device.
Why *.mov format and not something easily accessible
like putting it
Tabs do not make sense since they do not allow to see multiple method at the
same time
I know you are in love with tabs, but not for this ;)
Ben
On Aug 6, 2012, at 11:25 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
On Aug 6, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck marianop...@gmail.com
wrote:
- I
the more time I spend with OCompletion the more I think it's the wrong model:
NECompletion provides in many cases way better / quicker results
NOCompletion does tons of magic to increase the chances of a correct hit,
neglecting
- self sends
- super sends
- ClassSends
which is
They don't make sense for you (and Mariano), but they make perfectly sense for
me :)
In fact, scrolling window also hides methods, so... what's the problem? I would
prefer to have most of my methods in tabs, just because I want to edit all
together... not because I want to see them at the same
OCompletion works fine for me. And is much more valuable for me than EC... yes
we can (and need) improve it, but I don't want to drop OC.
Is the same case of nautilus many-methods and tabs. Just because you don't find
the function valuable, that does not means that it is not worthy for anybody
'Create group window' in window menu is not good for you?
-- Pavel
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com wrote:
They don't make sense for you (and Mariano), but they make perfectly sense
for me :)
In fact, scrolling window also hides methods, so... what's the
ok... since Mariano says that I need to be more clear, I will try to explain
why I want tabs as a layout:
being capable of have many methods opened in a browser allows more use-cases
that just visualize them together. At least, that functionality allow us to
*edit* them together, something
I've been playing with NativeBoost so a lot of my development time has
been in Pharo. I was having problems with simple syntax so I decided to
fileout my class and test it in the latest squeak.
A problem: class AlphaImage doesn't exist in squeak, so the filein
process ended up defining my
Maybe I don't really see when it gets useful...
Can you give me an example where you rely on the history information of
OCompletion?
On 2012-08-06, at 12:34, Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com wrote:
OCompletion works fine for me. And is much more valuable for me than EC...
yes we can
well... I cannot. But for me, most of the time OCompletion suggestions are
accurate (because I tend to use always the same methods, probably).
btw, I'm not saying that OCompletion is perfect, I think it can be improved a
lot... but I like it (what you did is already better, but it can be
[Apologies if you receive multiple copies of this Call for Papers]
CALL FOR PAPERS
SMALLTALKS 2012
6th International Conference on Smalltalk Technologies
http://www.fast.org.ar/smalltalks2012
Research Track: Call for Papers - http://scg.unibe.ch/wiki/events/smalltalks12
November 3th -
I'm a tab lover too and i think Esteban's idea is cool.
Visualize a lot of methods code is cool but visualize it in a 200@200 morph
dimension is for me impossible. In this case tab is a good solution.
Now you also get my point of view :)
(And tabs can also be a good idea for workspace ...
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Erwan Douaille douailleer...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a tab lover too and i think Esteban's idea is cool.
Visualize a lot of methods code is cool but visualize it in a 200@200 morph
dimension is for me impossible. In this case tab is a good solution.
Now you also
yes, but the usability is still poor for this case (IMHO), I want t tabs in the
code panel, not a complete tabbed window with multiple browsers :)
(I'm using window groups for workspaces, and for that it works great :)
On Aug 6, 2012, at 2:13 PM, Pavel Krivanek pavel.kriva...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/8/6 Pavel Krivanek pavel.kriva...@gmail.com
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Erwan Douaille douailleer...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm a tab lover too and i think Esteban's idea is cool.
Visualize a lot of methods code is cool but visualize it in a 200@200morph
dimension is for me
Stuart Herring wrote:
Excellent!
Any chance of having a vertical split instead of horizontal though?
Regards,
Stuart
And an option to do a diff between two vertical split texts
On 6 August 2012 09:48, Benjamin benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello guys :)
I just wanted
This feature is cl! And +1 on the tabbed code pane request.
Ben Coman wrote
And an option to do a diff between two vertical split texts
Being able to do a diff on a vertical split would be great for creating new
Metacello versions. Right now, you have to overwrite the last version and
This feature is cl! And +1 on the tabbed code pane request.
+1
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
20245
-
Issue 6510: update zinc
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6510
Issue 6514: Add allDefinedExtensionMethods to RPackage
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6514
Issue 6521: RPackageOrganizerinitialize does not
I updated my to Spec 1.1 with:
Gofer new
url: 'http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/Spec';
package: 'ConfigurationOfSpec';
load.
((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfSpec) project stableVersion) load: 'full'.
And I'm getting a weird error [1]. The weird part is that if I go to
Arraysorted: in the call chain,
Sean P. DeNigris wrote
And I'm getting a weird error.
Compiler recompileAll fixed that problem, but now I'm getting:
FrameLayoutSpec(Object)doesNotUnderstand: #fractions:offsets:
Receiver: a FrameLayoutSpec
Arguments and temporary variables:
aMessage:
Hi Lawson.
I've has a play and something along the following lines might help...
|extent f bm colors colorWords cm originalForm|
extent := 256@192.
originalForm := Display copy: (0@0 extent: extent).
f := Form extent: extent depth: 32.
0 to: 359 by: 1 do: [:h |
colors := (Color h: h s: 0.9 v:
Ok, even if I do not really like to be gentle with Esteban, here is a new
version :)
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/24369478/MultipleEditors2.mov
Ben
On Aug 6, 2012, at 4:03 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
This feature is cl! And +1 on the tabbed code pane request.
+1
Alexandre
--
Benjamin Van Ryseghem-2 wrote
Ok, even if I do not really like to be gentle with Esteban, here is a new
version :)
Woah, really nice! Thank you for the effort :)
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/New-feature-in-Nautilus-tp4643271p4643368.html
Sent from the Pharo
:)
have fun during holidays.
think about my pinning semantics. :)
Stef
This feature is cl! And +1 on the tabbed code pane request.
+1
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
I will ;)
Be first, I will rest ( sleeping in my hammock seams to be a really good
idea ^^ )
Ben
On Aug 6, 2012, at 6:40 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
:)
have fun during holidays.
think about my pinning semantics. :)
Stef
This feature is cl! And +1 on the tabbed code pane
On Aug 6, 2012, at 6:51 PM, Benjamin wrote:
I will ;)
Be first, I will rest ( sleeping in my hammock seams to be a really good
idea ^^ )
:)
Indeed rat because ESUG, I should do the same. Now I'm getting less tired so
this is good to feel that.
I will reread dune :)
Stef
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 August 2012 23:37, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr
wrote:
I have the impression that you will need a finer order at least for the
kernel.
so putting
SomeClassstartUp: quitting
systemShutdown:
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Guillermo Polito
guillermopol...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi!
Last days I was playing to replace the image startup/shutdown mechanism
via a pragma subscription because I was pissed off with how difficult is to
integrate the change of a new startup in the system. The
On 6 August 2012 21:09, Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Guillermo Polito guillermopol...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
Last days I was playing to replace the image startup/shutdown mechanism
via a pragma subscription because I was pissed off with how
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/http://www.squeaksource.com
Sean P. DeNigris wrote
I'd like to get this integrated ASAP.
Someone, anyone!! ;-) j/k. This is a pretty simple change that has been
reviewed by a smart human (Mariano). My preferences won't load in 2.0 until
it's integrated.
Thanks,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
See https://ci.lille.inria.fr/pharo/descriptor/hudson.triggers.SCMTrigger/ :
There are more SCM polling activities scheduled than handled, so the threads
are not keeping up with the demands. Check if your polling is hanging,
and/or increase the number of threads if necessary.
The following
It seems that (in 1.4, not sure about 2.0) if an image is launched with a
script (e.g. cogvm my.image my.st), StartupPreferences are never run. Is
that what's intended?
I just realized, for instance, that all my images that were built by my
Jenkins server (which pass a script as above) aren't
42 matches
Mail list logo
