Hi Pavel and all!
On 10/10/2012 02:15 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
About XUL, what is your impression about its future and, do you plan
some replacement for it in the future, maybe with full HTML5, Amber
based maybe?
XUL not fulfilled the expectations that have been inserted into it.
The only big
I tested Phobos on a Mac Retina, and it appears fuzzy. Is there any
possibility to fix this?
Doru
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to introduce you Phobos - the XULRunner based Smalltalk
> framework for development of native GUI with standard look
Can you please send a screenshot? Quick look at Google told me that
Firefox has similar problems. Try to add this line to the
defaults/preferences/prefs.js
pref("layers.acceleration.disabled", true);
XUL can be modified by styles like HTML. Maybe it can be fixed by
special stylesheet.
-- Pavel
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Göran Krampe wrote:
> Hi Pavel and all!
>
>
> On 10/10/2012 02:15 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
>>>
>>> About XUL, what is your impression about its future and, do you plan
>>> some replacement for it in the future, maybe with full HTML5, Amber
>>> based maybe?
>>
>>
>
On 10/10/12 11:04 AM, "Max Leske" wrote:
> Edgar, which version of Squeak are you using?
>
> Max
Current Squeak 4.4 updated with some code I add.
Edgar
Tudor Girba-2 wrote
> Did anyone find a solution to this problem?
I just got used to the fuzziness :)
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Pharo-on-retina-display-tp4642567p4650783.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Ah!
Could you try the Date fix I proposed in a 4.3 image?
BTW I'm working on fixing the other failing tests (for 4.3) aswell.
Cheers,
Max
On 11.10.2012, at 11:48, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/10/12 11:04 AM, "Max Leske" wrote:
>
>> Edgar, which version of Squeak are you using
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Pavel Krivanek
wrote:
> for Phobos [1] I created a very basic support for CodeMirror (HTML
> code editor) and OmniBrowser (on Pharo 1.4) so I can share some cool
> screenshot with you again ;-)
that looks great!
--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehostin
On 11 Oct 2012, at 17:46, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
> for Phobos [1] I created a very basic support for CodeMirror (HTML
> code editor) and OmniBrowser (on Pharo 1.4) so I can share some cool
> screenshot with you again ;-)
Getting better all the time !
Is this already in the .app download ?
--
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Max Leske wrote:
> Ah!
>
> Could you try the Date fix I proposed in a 4.3 image?
>
> BTW I'm working on fixing the other failing tests (for 4.3) aswell.
>
>
Excellent. Once you finish, let us know. We can do a compatibility package
if you want. It works like this
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>
> On 11 Oct 2012, at 17:46, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
>
>> for Phobos [1] I created a very basic support for CodeMirror (HTML
>> code editor) and OmniBrowser (on Pharo 1.4) so I can share some cool
>> screenshot with you again ;-)
>
> Ge
Hi Ben,
I really would like to write Spec binding for Phobos (Esteban will
want to do it for Mars etc.). But, how to say that, Spec was not
written with UI Independence in mind :-) Very basic example of that
fact:
ComposableModel>>buildWithSpec: aSpec
"Build the widget using the spec name
This method is actually the only one from ComposableModel with direct Morphic
binding :)
I am still trying to move that away, but I needed the rebuild to work
Ben
On Oct 11, 2012, at 8:49 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> I really would like to write Spec binding for Phobos (Esteban wi
Impressive.
Regards!
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Phobos-and-OmniBrowser-tp4650789p4650800.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 10/11/12 12:53 PM, "Max Leske" wrote:
> Ah!
>
> Could you try the Date fix I proposed in a 4.3 image?
>
> BTW I'm working on fixing the other failing tests (for 4.3) aswell.
>
> Cheers,
> Max
You was right, some changed recently in Squeak as 4.3 11860 (fresh unzipped)
do not fail the tw
On 10/11/12 12:46 PM, "Pavel Krivanek" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for Phobos [1] I created a very basic support for CodeMirror (HTML
> code editor) and OmniBrowser (on Pharo 1.4) so I can share some cool
> screenshot with you again ;-)
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/p/phobos-framework/
>
> Cheers,
>
:(
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> Tudor Girba-2 wrote
> > Did anyone find a solution to this problem?
>
> I just got used to the fuzziness :)
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://forum.world.st/Pharo-on-retina-display-tp4642567p4650783.html
> Sent from t
+1
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Edgar J. De Cleene
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/11/12 12:46 PM, "Pavel Krivanek" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > for Phobos [1] I created a very basic support for CodeMirror (HTML
> > code editor) and OmniBrowser (on Pharo 1.4) so I can share some cool
> > screenshot with yo
On 11 October 2012 20:52, Benjamin wrote:
> This method is actually the only one from ComposableModel with direct Morphic
> binding :)
>
>
> I am still trying to move that away, but I needed the rebuild to work
>
i think you can introduce own protocol (and put it as extension to
morphic, if you w
Unfortunately it is not only about a layer between Morphic and Spec.
Whole Spec design is greatly conforming to Morphic. Check out Spec
definitions, they look almost like transcription of Morphic calls
MethodToolbar class >> defaultSpec
^ { #Panel.
#changeT
On Oct 11, 2012, at 11:04 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
> Unfortunately it is not only about a layer between Morphic and Spec.
> Whole Spec design is greatly conforming to Morphic. Check out Spec
> definitions, they look almost like transcription of Morphic calls
>
> MethodToolbar class >> defaultSp
On 11 October 2012 23:04, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
> Unfortunately it is not only about a layer between Morphic and Spec.
> Whole Spec design is greatly conforming to Morphic. Check out Spec
> definitions, they look almost like transcription of Morphic calls
>
> MethodToolbar class >> defaultSpec
>
Thanks Edgar. Much appreciated.
On 11.10.2012, at 21:14, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/11/12 12:53 PM, "Max Leske" wrote:
>
>> Ah!
>>
>> Could you try the Date fix I proposed in a 4.3 image?
>>
>> BTW I'm working on fixing the other failing tests (for 4.3) aswell.
>>
>> Cheers
23 matches
Mail list logo
