Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-11 Thread Camillo Bruni
On 2013-04-11, at 14:56, Norbert Hartl wrote: > > Am 11.04.2013 um 14:44 schrieb Camillo Bruni : > >> Norbert, >> I deprecated now the old scripts and I had a look at your script proposal >> and I extended it a bit: >> >> https://gist.github.com/dh83/5363000 >> >> what do you think? >> > L

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-11 Thread Norbert Hartl
Am 11.04.2013 um 14:44 schrieb Camillo Bruni : > Norbert, > I deprecated now the old scripts and I had a look at your script proposal > and I extended it a bit: > > https://gist.github.com/dh83/5363000 > > what do you think? > Looks good to me, although I find … IMAGE="$DIR/Pharo.image"; if

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-11 Thread Camillo Bruni
Norbert, I deprecated now the old scripts and I had a look at your script proposal and I extended it a bit: https://gist.github.com/dh83/5363000 what do you think? On 2013-04-02, at 12:02, Camillo Bruni wrote: > Yes I just haven't fully announced it yet ;) since I only programmed them > this

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-02 Thread Camillo Bruni
Yes I just haven't fully announced it yet ;) since I only programmed them this saturday and was waiting for the pharo conf ;) But I will deprecate it with a warning message in it tomorrow or so. And then people should rename their scripts. On 2013-04-02, at 11:58, Norbert Hartl wrote: > Well,

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-02 Thread Camillo Bruni
On 2013-04-02, at 11:24, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > Hi Norbert, > > the vm-ui.sh script is deprecated (yep, Camillo already deprecated something, > even if it is brand new). > > now the valid scripts are > > "pharo" and "pharo-ui" with the same contents ;) > Esteban > > On Apr 2, 2013,

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-02 Thread Norbert Hartl
Well, I would say a mv vm-ui.sh pharo-ui would do a good job to get out of deprecation. Honestly if the scripts are deprecated just take them out of the download. I don't know why to leave them there because it is confusing. Norbert Am 02.04.2013 um 11:24 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano : > Hi No

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-02 Thread Camillo Bruni
On 2013-04-02, at 10:38, Norbert Hartl wrote: > Very good Cami. I have two remarks. If it should be short I think that > > curl -sL get.pharo.org | bash > > is shorter than > > wget --quiet -O - get.pharo.org | bash yes definitely! though it seems that I cannot properly install curl under

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-02 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
On 02 Apr 2013, at 11:19, Tudor Girba wrote: > We are. Thx! > Doru > > > On Apr 2, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > >> >> On 02 Apr 2013, at 11:12, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >>> You should see the demo live. It's so ... how should I put it ... sexy :) >> >> Yes, I wish I w

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-02 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
Hi Norbert, the vm-ui.sh script is deprecated (yep, Camillo already deprecated something, even if it is brand new). now the valid scripts are "pharo" and "pharo-ui" :) Esteban On Apr 2, 2013, at 11:17 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > Another attempt. > > Norbert > > > > Am 02.04.2013 um 1

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-02 Thread Tudor Girba
We are. Doru On Apr 2, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > On 02 Apr 2013, at 11:12, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> You should see the demo live. It's so ... how should I put it ... sexy :) > > Yes, I wish I was there - hope you are recording ... > >> Doru >> >> On Apr 2, 2013,

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-02 Thread Norbert Hartl
Another attempt. Norbert vm-ui.sh Description: Binary data Am 02.04.2013 um 10:43 schrieb Norbert Hartl : > Ah, rats, didn't think it through. It only works for commandline switches > that do not have an argument itself. Sad and sorry! > > Norbert > > Am 02.04.2013 um 10:38 schrieb Norbe

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-02 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
On 02 Apr 2013, at 11:12, Tudor Girba wrote: > You should see the demo live. It's so ... how should I put it ... sexy :) Yes, I wish I was there - hope you are recording ... > Doru > > On Apr 2, 2013, at 10:43 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > >> On 02 Apr 2013, at 09:15, Camillo Bruni wr

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-02 Thread Tudor Girba
You should see the demo live. It's so ... how should I put it ... sexy :) Doru On Apr 2, 2013, at 10:43 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > On 02 Apr 2013, at 09:15, Camillo Bruni wrote: > >> we're back up, shinier than ever ;) >> >> check http://get.pharo.org ;) > > Beautiful and simple

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-02 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
On 02 Apr 2013, at 09:15, Camillo Bruni wrote: > we're back up, shinier than ever ;) > > check http://get.pharo.org ;) Beautiful and simple, the mark of a true master. Cool HTML/bash hack ;-) Sven

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-02 Thread Norbert Hartl
Ah, rats, didn't think it through. It only works for commandline switches that do not have an argument itself. Sad and sorry! Norbert Am 02.04.2013 um 10:38 schrieb Norbert Hartl : > Very good Cami. I have two remarks. If it should be short I think that > > curl -sL get.pharo.org | bash > >

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-02 Thread Norbert Hartl
Very good Cami. I have two remarks. If it should be short I think that curl -sL get.pharo.org | bash is shorter than wget --quiet -O - get.pharo.org | bash If I see it correct the script is used for CI but as there is a get.pharo.org host I assume it is supposed to be an easy entry point for

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-02 Thread Camillo Bruni
we're back up, shinier than ever ;) check http://get.pharo.org ;) now you can use: wget --quiet -O - get.pharo.org | bash for the current stable release of Pharo and the PharoVM. On 2013-04-01, at 22:52, Tudor Girba wrote: > No stress. In the worst case you can fix it tomorrow during t

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-01 Thread Tudor Girba
No stress. In the worst case you can fix it tomorrow during the tutorial :). Doru On Apr 1, 2013, at 10:26 PM, Camillo Bruni wrote: > > On 2013-04-01, at 22:09, "Sean P. DeNigris" wrote: > >> Tudor Girba-2 wrote >>> Could it have something to do with the latest optimizations of Camillo? >>

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-01 Thread Camillo Bruni
On 2013-04-01, at 22:09, "Sean P. DeNigris" wrote: > Tudor Girba-2 wrote >> Could it have something to do with the latest optimizations of Camillo? > > Probably... Cami breaks everything :-P dammit, I wanted to silently add the new zeroconf scripts obviously something went horribly wrong there

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-01 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
Tudor Girba-2 wrote > Could it have something to do with the latest optimizations of Camillo? Probably... Cami breaks everything :-P - Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/3-0-CI-build-is-broken-tp4679211p4679220.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing lis

Re: [Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-01 Thread Tudor Girba
So is the Moose build (Pharo 2.0). Could it have something to do with the latest optimizations of Camillo? Doru On Apr 1, 2013, at 9:25 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-1-Tracker/82/console > > 2013-04-01 20:54:16 (6.41 MB/s) - `updates30.staged'

[Pharo-project] [3.0] CI build is broken

2013-04-01 Thread Marcus Denker
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-1-Tracker/82/console 2013-04-01 20:54:16 (6.41 MB/s) - `updates30.staged' saved [28/28] + bash + wget --quiet -O - http://files.pharo.org/script/ciPharo30PharoVM.sh Downloading the latest 30 Image: http://files.pharo.org/image/30/latest.zip