Re: [Pharo-project] Contribution CI Semantics

2013-03-24 Thread p...@highoctane.be
I started this little thing, anyone welcome to improve it... http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/HOPomodoro Phil 2013/3/24 stephane ducasse : >>> >>> >> Thanks, I would like that - but I'll hold off until I have time to look at >> it properly - after I finish writing up my dissertation > >

Re: [Pharo-project] Contribution CI Semantics

2013-03-24 Thread stephane ducasse
>> >> > Thanks, I would like that - but I'll hold off until I have time to look at it > properly - after I finish writing up my dissertation use pomodoro technique to get focused and get rid of it :). > - when I want to move my project to Pharo 2.0, create a Configuration and add > it as a

Re: [Pharo-project] Contribution CI Semantics

2013-03-24 Thread Ben Coman
Camillo Bruni wrote: Hi Ben, On 2013-03-24, at 03:31, Ben Coman wrote: Just curious about how the Contribution CI is set up. Is is based off the latest ConfigurationOf or just the latest mcz loaded in the folder? We use Configurations. Will you be running a #stable as well as #

Re: [Pharo-project] Contribution CI Semantics

2013-03-24 Thread Camillo Bruni
Hi Ben, On 2013-03-24, at 03:31, Ben Coman wrote: > Just curious about how the Contribution CI is set up. Is is based off the > latest ConfigurationOf or just the latest mcz loaded in the folder? We use Configurations. > Will you be running a #stable as well as #development jobs for contribu

[Pharo-project] Contribution CI Semantics

2013-03-23 Thread Ben Coman
Just curious about how the Contribution CI is set up. Is is based off the latest ConfigurationOf or just the latest mcz loaded in the folder? Will you be running a #stable as well as #development jobs for contributions? Or will that decision be configured somehow by the contribution develo