Hello all,
I managed to create an install script; as I suspected would be case, it was
very anticlimactic. I tried creating a password-protected directory under my
personal web site, but that did not go well. The authentication is weird, so
it was probably asking a lot. A directory repositor
On Jul 15, 2009, at 6:04 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I managed to create an install script; as I suspected would be case,
> it was very anticlimactic. I tried creating a password-protected
> directory under my personal web site, but that did not go well. The
> authenticat
> Does Monticello/PackageInfo see a change in method category (aka package) as
> a change to the package? It appears not, and it worries me a little in that
> it seems to make it easy to lose work by forgetting to save it.
The MCWorkingCopy class is notified about changes in the system and
mark
[mailto:pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Stéphane
Ducasse
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:58 PM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Making some progress, and a few observations
On Jul 15, 2009, at 6:04 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> He
nria.fr
> ] On Behalf Of Stéphane Ducasse
> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:58 PM
> To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Making some progress, and a few
> observations
>
>
> On Jul 15, 2009, at 6:04 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
>
>>
2:31 PM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Making some progress, and a few observations
>
> Stef,
>
> In terms of response times, even with a lot of things turned off, I
> was still surprised at how long it takes to change from even one
> method to anothe
the sense the wait cursors are displayed, on Linux, for a
> > smaller fraction of the down time than on Windows.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> > [mailto:pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.
0 mb.
>
>> Also, I get the sense the wait cursors are displayed, on Linux, for a
>> smaller fraction of the down time than on Windows.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> [mailto:pharo-project-boun...
achine
>> (xp), with FreeType in use, and it's ok with the standard tools and
>> the w2k theme.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> [mailto:pharo-project-boun...@lis
: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
[mailto:pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Alain Plantec
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 5:19 PM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Making some progress, and a few observations
Adrian Lienhard a écrit :
&
...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
[pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Alain Plantec
[alain.plan...@free.fr]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 6:19 PM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Making some progress, and a few observations
Adrian Lienhard a écrit :
> Bill,
>
&
; ] On Behalf Of Alain Plantec [alain.plan...@free.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 6:19 PM
> To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Making some progress, and a few
> observations
>
> Adrian Lienhard a écrit :
>> Bill,
>>
>>
-
From: "Schwab,Wilhelm K"
To: ;
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 2:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Making some progress, and a few observations
On my crusty old Linux box:
155339805 bytecodes/sec; 3931964 sends/sec
However, I always like to test on less than my customers wi
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 4:27 AM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Making some progress, and a few observations
Sounds like your machine is 4 times slower than ours.
which is good we should all have machine like that to make pharo fast
On Jul 16, 2009, at
)
From: Gary Chambers
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 6:51:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Making some progress, and a few observations
In the Windows camp, Watery2 theme...
Vista 64bit (32bit VM, of course), 4GB DDR2-800, Q9550 (2.8GHz),
Pharo0.1Core
gt; *To:* Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 16, 2009 6:51:59 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Pharo-project] Making some progress, and a few
> observations
>
> In the Windows camp, Watery2 theme...
>
> Vista 64bit (32bit VM, of course), 4GB DDR2-800,
Here are my numbers.
Computer: Thinkpad T61,Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 @ 2GHz, 2GB RAM)
OS: Windows XP SP3
Seaside 2.8.3 One Click Image:
'157248157 bytecodes/sec; 4708854 sends/sec'
Seaside 2.8.4 One Click Image:
'158907510 bytecodes/sec; 4592283 sends/sec'
pharo0.1-10373web09.07.2:
'156479217 byt
I think it has no sense to test with several images. Look adrian comment
"This basically measures how many bytecodes and messages the VM can
execute per second."
So, I guess it is a benchmark for VM + hardware. I don't think the image
can influence much here. Am I correct?
best,
Mariano
On Thu
...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Mariano
Martinez Peck
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 9:46 AM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Making some progress, and a few observations
I think it has no sense to test with several images. Look adrian comment
"
30869 sends/sec'
>
> Time millisecondsToRun: [
> Browser fullOnClass: Object selector: #at:.
> World displayWorld] 677
>
> Still feels quite responsive even on that!
>
> Regards, Gary
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Schwab,Wilhelm K"
>
2009/7/16 Mariano Martinez Peck :
> I think it has no sense to test with several images. Look adrian comment
>
> "This basically measures how many bytecodes and messages the VM can
> execute per second."
>
> So, I guess it is a benchmark for VM + hardware. I don't think the image
> can influence mu
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo
wrote:
>
>
> With the latest pharo-web, with NOD32 antivirus disabled, the speed up
> was pretty significant.
>
yes. Nod32 WON'T let you use Squeak, Pharo, Quis or whatever. You can notice
this when you use monticello. As the .changes is being
22 matches
Mail list logo
