Ok, I created a bug entry:
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7384
Cheers,
Doru
On Jan 31, 2013, at 10:18 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
wrote:
> I do not know
> but indeed it would be good to have one good one instead of three half
>
> Stef
>
> On Jan 31, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Tudor Girba
I do not know
but indeed it would be good to have one good one instead of three half
Stef
On Jan 31, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Does anyone know the difference between:
> - OrderedIdentityDictionary from Spec and
> - OrderPreservingDictionary from
> http://www.squeaksource.com/Orde
It will come :)
Stef
> ... and we need Spec as a project under team Pharo, in sthub :)
>
>
>> Stef wrote:
>>> good idea.
>>> Do you know the test coverage of the class?
>>> Because it would be nice to run hapao on it and write some tests if there
>>> are none.
>>
>> Actually there are no test
Does anyone know the difference between:
- OrderedIdentityDictionary from Spec and
- OrderPreservingDictionary from
http://www.squeaksource.com/OrderPreservingDict
?
we use the latter in XMLSupport and I think we could probably consolidate.
Doru
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Esteban Lorenza
Ok so it would be good to address the issue.
We should get better and larger collection choice.
Since you already add a look could you check it again.
Stef
On Jan 31, 2013, at 5:49 AM, Clément Bera wrote:
> Actually this was in the bug tracker
>
> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id
Actually this was in the bug tracker
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2759&can=1&q=orderedDictionary&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Summary%20Milestone%20Difficulty
error 2759
This OrderedIdentityDictionary is only used for user interface that is why
it is on Spec-Core for now. See
... and we need Spec as a project under team Pharo, in sthub :)
On Jan 31, 2013, at 8:28 AM, "Torsten Bergmann" wrote:
> Stef wrote:
>> good idea.
>> Do you know the test coverage of the class?
>> Because it would be nice to run hapao on it and write some tests if there
>> are none.
>
> Actual
Stef wrote:
>good idea.
>Do you know the test coverage of the class?
>Because it would be nice to run hapao on it and write some tests if there are
>none.
Actually there are no tests - at least not in the Pharo image.
Maybe Benjamin can comment if there are some tests in the Spec universe for it.
On Jan 30, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
> The class "OrderedIdentityDictionary" is currently defined in package
> "Spec-Core".
>
> Since it is useful also in other scenarios and I do not want a dependency
> on spec: wouldnt it make sense to move it to a more common "Collections-...
On 30 January 2013 19:44, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
> The class "OrderedIdentityDictionary" is currently defined in package
> "Spec-Core".
>
> Since it is useful also in other scenarios and I do not want a dependency
> on spec: wouldnt it make sense to move it to a more common "Collections-..."
> p
The class "OrderedIdentityDictionary" is currently defined in package
"Spec-Core".
Since it is useful also in other scenarios and I do not want a dependency
on spec: wouldnt it make sense to move it to a more common "Collections-..."
package.
Since there is already "Collections-Unordered" I woul
11 matches
Mail list logo
