[Pharo-project] issue 496: Morph>>heading

2009-10-22 Thread Laval Jannik
Hi, Morph>>heading is from eToy. It is used to rotate a Morph. If we remove it, we remove the possibility to rotate a morph. What are your positions about this behavior ? Do we considere it as a system behavior or as an eToy thing which must be removed ? Cheers, --- Jannik Laval PhD Student -

Re: [Pharo-project] issue 496: Morph>>heading

2009-10-26 Thread Laval Jannik
Hi, I bring out a past message. And my question is more general. What do we want to keep from etoy ? Cheers, Jannik On Oct 22, 2009, at 09:33 , Laval Jannik wrote: > Hi, > > Morph>>heading is from eToy. > It is used to rotate a Morph. > If we remove it, we remove the possibility to rotate a mo

Re: [Pharo-project] issue 496: Morph>>heading

2009-10-26 Thread Mariano Martinez Peck
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Laval Jannik wrote: > Hi, > > I bring out a past message. > And my question is more general. > > What do we want to keep from etoy ? > I would said NOTHING in the core or even Pharo image. However, it would be a good idea to put all the interesting eToy stuff in

Re: [Pharo-project] issue 496: Morph>>heading

2009-10-26 Thread Laval Jannik
On Oct 26, 2009, at 15:21 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Laval Jannik wrote: Hi, I bring out a past message. And my question is more general. What do we want to keep from etoy ? I would said NOTHING in the core or even Pharo image. I agree with you.

Re: [Pharo-project] issue 496: Morph>>heading

2009-10-26 Thread Mariano Martinez Peck
2009/10/26 Laval Jannik > > On Oct 26, 2009, at 15:21 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Laval Jannik wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I bring out a past message. >> And my question is more general. >> >> What do we want to keep from etoy ? >> > > I would said NOTHING i

Re: [Pharo-project] issue 496: Morph>>heading

2009-10-26 Thread Marcus Denker
However, it would be a good idea to put all the interesting eToy stuff in an external package so that those who want to load that stuff, are able to do it. Because, make an external package of it needs a big work... I don't think so. Etoy is more complex than you think. It would be (

Re: [Pharo-project] issue 496: Morph>>heading

2009-10-26 Thread Laval Jannik
Yes, Marcus is right. But are there some behaviors that we want to keep and integrate in Core ? For example, the Rotate functionality in the halo. Cheers, Jannik On Oct 26, 2009, at 16:22 , Marcus Denker wrote: However, it would be a good idea to put all the interesting eToy stuff in

Re: [Pharo-project] issue 496: Morph>>heading

2009-10-26 Thread Mariano Martinez Peck
2009/10/26 Marcus Denker > > >> However, it would be a good idea to put all the interesting eToy stuff in >> an external package so that those who want to load that stuff, are able to >> do it. >> >> >> >> > >> Because, make an external package of it needs a big work... >> > > I don't think so. >

Re: [Pharo-project] issue 496: Morph>>heading

2009-10-26 Thread Adrian Lienhard
I think a good criterium is whether the functionality is used in Pharo today. Does anybody use rotating morphs? I don't think so. Cheers, Adrian On Oct 26, 2009, at 16:40 , Laval Jannik wrote: > Yes, Marcus is right. > > But are there some behaviors that we want to keep and integrate in > Co

Re: [Pharo-project] issue 496: Morph>>heading

2009-10-26 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
jannik you ask the right question And this is ugly. Now we could think about possible usecases. If we build a image processing system: we need it but in that case we can copy it. Stef > Yes, Marcus is right. > > But are there some behaviors that we want to keep and integrate in > Core ? > F

Re: [Pharo-project] issue 496: Morph>>heading

2009-10-27 Thread Laval Jannik
So, Is anyone use the rotation in pharo-Core ? If not, I will remove it. And I will try to put it in another package, which will be loaded after. Jannik On Oct 26, 2009, at 19:11 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > jannik > > you ask the right question > And this is ugly. Now we could think about poss

Re: [Pharo-project] issue 496: Morph>>heading

2009-10-28 Thread Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez
El mié, 28-10-2009 a las 07:03 +0100, Laval Jannik escribió: > So, > > Is anyone use the rotation in pharo-Core ? > If not, I will remove it. > And I will try to put it in another package, which will be loaded after. > Remove it, please, is not a core feature. > Jannik > > > On Oct 26, 2009,

Re: [Pharo-project] issue 496: Morph>>heading

2009-10-28 Thread Laval Jannik
On Oct 28, 2009, at 16:26 , Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez wrote: > El mié, 28-10-2009 a las 07:03 +0100, Laval Jannik escribió: >> So, >> >> Is anyone use the rotation in pharo-Core ? >> If not, I will remove it. >> And I will try to put it in another package, which will be loaded >> after. >> >

Re: [Pharo-project] issue 496: Morph>>heading

2009-10-28 Thread Serge Stinckwich
2009/10/28 Laval Jannik : > > On Oct 28, 2009, at 16:26 , Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez wrote: > >> El mié, 28-10-2009 a las 07:03 +0100, Laval Jannik escribió: >>> So, >>> >>> Is anyone use the rotation in pharo-Core ? >>> If not, I will remove it. >>> And I will try to put it in another package, w

Re: [Pharo-project] issue 496: Morph>>heading

2009-10-28 Thread Laval Jannik
On Oct 29, 2009, at 04:27 , Serge Stinckwich wrote: > 2009/10/28 Laval Jannik : >> >> On Oct 28, 2009, at 16:26 , Miguel Enrique Cobá Martinez wrote: >> >>> El mié, 28-10-2009 a las 07:03 +0100, Laval Jannik escribió: So, Is anyone use the rotation in pharo-Core ? If not, I wi

Re: [Pharo-project] issue 496: Morph>>heading

2009-10-29 Thread Alain Plantec
Hi Jannik and all, Laval Jannik a écrit : > On Oct 29, 2009, at 04:27 , Serge Stinckwich wrote: > >> Are you sure, this is not used anywhere ? >> Sometimes you need to draw a morph with a specific heading. >> ... > Now, do you use, sometimes, this functionality in pharoCore ? or do > you