2009/7/1 Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com:
2009/7/1 Michael Rueger m.rue...@acm.org:
Stephen Pair wrote:
accomplish this (in VisualWorks). It would be really cool if things
like filenames and directories didn't make assumptions about the file
system with which they are used (so that you
Ok I also like some parts of the rio api.
Arg too much to do.
Stef
On Jul 1, 2009, at 11:32 PM, Michael Rueger wrote:
Igor Stasenko wrote:
how then i could write a 'FileDirectory default' in terms of URIs?
'file://.' asURI ?
No, you would still write FileDirectory default :-)
But then
Ok I also like some parts of the rio api.
Arg too much to do.
Stef
On Jul 1, 2009, at 11:32 PM, Michael Rueger wrote:
Igor Stasenko wrote:
how then i could write a 'FileDirectory default' in terms of URIs?
'file://.' asURI ?
No, you would still write FileDirectory default :-)
But then
Pharoers,
In my image I have a few methods that make file access a little more
legible:
Http // 'www.slashdot.org/'
File // '/Users/dave/hello.c'
It reads just like a protocol string :)
Both of these class methods return a ByteString, what I typically need 99%
of the time. When I need a
Hi guys
we should really consider to have an alternate (may be building on /
rewriting part of RIO)
but FileDirectory sucks.
I have a file
FileDirectory default
and now I want to get two levels up.
Well after 20 min looking around I could not find a way.
I'm probably too stupid for
Well after 20 min looking around I could not find a way.
I'm probably too stupid for squeak arcane logic.
FileDirectory default containingDirectory containingDirectory
Yes, it took me a long time to find out the first time.
Lukas
--
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
Smalltalk deserves a better library for file. What a crap this stuff.
The problem is that a good platform independent library is not a
trivial thing. Also from the architectural point of view this is a
rather difficult problem. The biggest problem is though that the
primitives where everything
, July 01, 2009 8:43 AM
To: Pharo Development
Subject: [Pharo-project] why FileDirectory sucks
Hi guys
we should really consider to have an alternate (may be building on / rewriting
part of RIO) but FileDirectory sucks.
I have a file
FileDirectory default
and now I want to get two levels
@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] why FileDirectory sucks
Well after 20 min looking around I could not find a way.
I'm probably too stupid for squeak arcane logic.
FileDirectory default containingDirectory containingDirectory
Yes, it took me a long time to find out the first time.
Lukas
...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 12:11 PM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] why FileDirectory sucks
Smalltalk deserves a better library for file. What a crap this stuff.
The problem is that a good platform
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
stephane.duca...@inria.frwrote:
Hi guys
we should really consider to have an alternate (may be building on /
rewriting part of RIO)
but FileDirectory sucks.
I have a file
FileDirectory default
and now I want to get two levels up.
On Jul 1, 2009, at 1:28 PM, Stephen Pair wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr
wrote:
Hi guys
we should really consider to have an alternate (may be building on /
rewriting part of RIO)
but FileDirectory sucks.
I have a file
FileDirectory
Well actually in Sophie we used URI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URI
*hint* all that code is MIT
By using relative URI then asking for the read or readwrite stream
later we could build URI constructs that referred to disk, to a server
in the cloud, to memory.
Oh and let's not forget the
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:18 PM, John M McIntosh
john...@smalltalkconsulting.com wrote:
So I'd suggest one thinks about reusing the URI logic
2009/7/1 Cameron Sanders camsander...@roadrunner.com
And back to the main topic here... aren't URL's fairly well generalized?
Are they not the right
Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
One thing that seems to be missing is a good abstraction of relative
paths, and some type of #, message to allow relative ones to be
tacked onto full ones (FileDirectory etc.)??
In Sophie and to an even larger extent in an experimental fork I based
everything on URIs
Stephen Pair wrote:
accomplish this (in VisualWorks). It would be really cool if things
like filenames and directories didn't make assumptions about the file
system with which they are used (so that you could have filenames for in
memory file systems, or filenames for other file systems
Igor Stasenko wrote:
how then i could write a 'FileDirectory default' in terms of URIs?
'file://.' asURI ?
No, you would still write FileDirectory default :-)
But then you would do something like
(FileDirectory default uri resolveRelativePath: 'myDir/images') directory
I know, doesn't look
On Jul 1, 2009, at 7:10 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
Smalltalk deserves a better library for file. What a crap this stuff.
The problem is that a good platform independent library is not a
trivial thing. Also from the architectural point of view this is a
rather difficult problem. The biggest
: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 12:08 PM
To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] why FileDirectory sucks
Well after 20 min looking around I could not find a way.
I'm probably too stupid for squeak arcane logic.
FileDirectory default containingDirectory
On Jul 1, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Stephen Pair wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr
wrote:
Hi guys
we should really consider to have an alternate (may be building on /
rewriting part of RIO)
but FileDirectory sucks.
I have a file
Well actually in Sophie we used URI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URI
*hint* all that code is MIT
I know I just did not find time
Good I do not know why a moment I thought that the sophie license was
different.
By using relative URI then asking for the read or readwrite stream
later
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Michael Rueger m.rue...@acm.org wrote:
Igor Stasenko wrote:
how then i could write a 'FileDirectory default' in terms of URIs?
'file://.' asURI ?
No, you would still write FileDirectory default :-)
But then you would do something like
(FileDirectory
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Well actually in Sophie we used URI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URI
*hint* all that code is MIT
I know I just did not find time
Good I do not know why a moment I thought that the sophie license was
different.
It actually is. New BSD, which is basically MIT
On 1-Jul-09, at 4:02 PM, Michael Rueger wrote:
It actually is. New BSD, which is basically MIT with the advertising
clause.
So if we add code from Sophie (other than fixes) we would need to list
the new BSD license as well.
Michael
I must turn the A/C up another notch before talking
I think there is a whole day of reading on the squeak list now about
backwards forward compatibility if you
change the meaning of FileSystem default defaultDirectory and have it
return a URI, that would break things, or
assumptions etc.
Personally I'd think it should be
URI
25 matches
Mail list logo
