Re: [Pharo-users] Laser Game

2013-09-04 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
I should look at the tutorial because it looks really strange to me to use a sketchMorph for a board game. On Sep 4, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Маркіян Різун wrote: > I thought about that:) SketchMorph is used to create game board, so I need it. > Can I use some other Morph? > > Mark > > > 2013/9/3

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Marcus Denker
On Sep 4, 2013, at 6:30 PM, p...@highoctane.be wrote: > I was using 2.0 > Yes, this is what I understood from the original report. Marcus signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Paul DeBruicker
On 09/04/2013 09:31 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > Paul are you also using DBXTalk just by chance in that image? > > Cheers, No I haven't used DBXTalk yet.

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
phil was working with 3.0 (afaik) mariano was having problems with flushing monticello caches. I think it was not the same. Esteban On Sep 4, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Paul DeBruicker wrote: > On 09/04/2013 12:54 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >> I'm not sure what we are seeing in pharo3 is the same p

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Paul DeBruicker
On 09/04/2013 12:54 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > I'm not sure what we are seeing in pharo3 is the same problem reported in > pharo2. > Of course if it is, we will backport. > But "inflation" problem in ph3 is very consistent and repeatable, the problem > reported in ph2... well, I never seen

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Paul DeBruicker
On 09/04/2013 02:44 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > I will like to know which vm version are you using. > > Esteban the one thats packaged with the one-clicks 3.9-7 #1 Wed Mar 13 18:22:44 CET 2013 gcc 4.4.3 NBCoInterpreter NativeBoost-CogPlugin-EstebanLorenzano.18 uuid: a53445f9-c0c0-4015-97a3-

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Mariano Martinez Peck
mm DBXTalk and image save sounded a bell... When we developed OpenDBXDriver, we idea was to make it as simple as possible for the final user. One thing we did was to automatically disconnect all opened connections at system shutdown...so that not to let connections open in the DB. Now I realiz

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread p...@highoctane.be
I was using 2.0 --- Philippe Back Dramatic Performance Improvements Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027 Mail:p...@highoctane.be | Web: http://philippeback.eu Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos High Octane SP

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Paul DeBruicker
On 09/04/2013 12:14 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > I totally agree: the why use RFB part and the remote browsing/debugging > replacement part. On the other hand, if people want to use some library, that > should be possible. > > The problem is this case is (again) that have a user (no offenc

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Pharo Sprint in Buenos Aires

2013-09-04 Thread Camillo Bruni
From the doodle we're around 7, so I'd count with something like 10 people? And yes, I think internet connection is a requirement, at least for updating the issue tracker. On 2013-09-04, at 10:32, Nicolas Passerini wrote: > I think UTN is not a good idea for a Pharo sprint, because we will need

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Pharo Sprint in Buenos Aires

2013-09-04 Thread Sebastian Tleye
The Pabellon 1 is closed on saturdays afternoon, but have you asked for Pabellon 2? I think it's open on saturdays (i don't know if it is possible to book a room) 2013/9/4 Guillermo Polito > Probably UTN? > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Camillo Bruni wrote: > >> So it looks like we are go

Re: [Pharo-users] How to get the return value of a context?

2013-09-04 Thread Norbert Hartl
Am 04.09.2013 um 14:19 schrieb Norbert Hartl : > interleavedCtx := [ | foo | > foo := self dummySend > … > ] It doesn't work with a temp inside the block. Using a method temp does what I think it does. So the very hackish way of doing it is at the moment | foo | ... inter

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Pharo Sprint in Buenos Aires

2013-09-04 Thread Guillermo Polito
Probably UTN? On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Camillo Bruni wrote: > So it looks like we are going to do the Pharo sprint in Buenos Aires > Saturday, the 14th of September. > The question is now where do we meet? > The original idea was to reserver a room at the UBA, but that is not > possible t

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Pharo Sprint in Buenos Aires

2013-09-04 Thread Camillo Bruni
So it looks like we are going to do the Pharo sprint in Buenos Aires Saturday, the 14th of September. The question is now where do we meet? The original idea was to reserver a room at the UBA, but that is not possible the weekend. Any suggestions? On 2013-09-03, at 09:05, Mariano Martinez Peck

[Pharo-users] How to get the return value of a context?

2013-09-04 Thread Norbert Hartl
I'm trying to interleave some behavior in the normal execution flow. For this I do something like targetCtx := self findTargetContext. interleavedCtx := [ self doSomething ] asContext. interleavedCtx swapSender: (targetCtx swapSender: interleavedCtx). Basically this works pretty fine.

Re: [Pharo-users] Laser Game

2013-09-04 Thread Маркіян Різун
2013/9/4 p...@highoctane.be > you can get a rectanglemorph and a Form I'll try that) Thank you

Re: [Pharo-users] Laser Game

2013-09-04 Thread p...@highoctane.be
you can get a rectanglemorph and a Form On Wednesday, September 4, 2013, Маркіян Різун wrote: > I thouqght about that:) SketchMorph is used to create game board, so I need it. > Can I use some other Morph? > Mark > > 2013/9/3 Stéphane Ducasse >> >> On Sep 3, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Маркіян Різун wro

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
On Sep 4, 2013, at 12:10 PM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > > Am 04.09.2013 um 11:43 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano : > >> >> On Sep 4, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> >>> >>> On 04 Sep 2013, at 10:47, Norbert Hartl wrote: >>> In all my other projects using zinc and RFB I didn

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
On Sep 4, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > On 04 Sep 2013, at 10:47, Norbert Hartl wrote: > >> In all my other projects using zinc and RFB I didn't see the problem. But >> then I don't save images in production. > > Images are very cool and very useful, but saving images

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
On Sep 4, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > On 04 Sep 2013, at 10:53, Norbert Hartl wrote: > >> >> Am 04.09.2013 um 09:14 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe : >> >>> >>> On 04 Sep 2013, at 08:57, Marcus Denker wrote: >>> On Sep 4, 2013, at 12:42 AM, Paul DeBruicke

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Norbert Hartl
Am 04.09.2013 um 11:43 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano : > > On Sep 4, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > >> >> On 04 Sep 2013, at 10:47, Norbert Hartl wrote: >> >>> In all my other projects using zinc and RFB I didn't see the problem. But >>> then I don't save images in productio

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
On 04 Sep 2013, at 11:43, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > > On Sep 4, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > >> >> On 04 Sep 2013, at 10:47, Norbert Hartl wrote: >> >>> In all my other projects using zinc and RFB I didn't see the problem. But >>> then I don't save images in producti

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Norbert Hartl
Am 04.09.2013 um 11:41 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano : > > On Sep 4, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > >> >> Am 04.09.2013 um 01:13 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano : >> >>> >>> On Sep 4, 2013, at 12:42 AM, Paul DeBruicker wrote: >>> On 09/03/2013 12:25 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
On Sep 4, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > > Am 04.09.2013 um 01:13 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano : > >> >> On Sep 4, 2013, at 12:42 AM, Paul DeBruicker wrote: >> >>> On 09/03/2013 12:25 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: If you do not give us more information we will never be able to fi

Re: [Pharo-users] Laser Game

2013-09-04 Thread Маркіян Різун
I thought about that:) SketchMorph is used to create game board, so I need it. Can I use some other Morph? Mark 2013/9/3 Stéphane Ducasse > > On Sep 3, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Маркіян Різун wrote: > > I was dealing with laser game on pharo and found two problems. > 1. LedMorph is missing but it's

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
On 04 Sep 2013, at 10:53, Norbert Hartl wrote: > > Am 04.09.2013 um 09:14 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe : > >> >> On 04 Sep 2013, at 08:57, Marcus Denker wrote: >> >>> >>> On Sep 4, 2013, at 12:42 AM, Paul DeBruicker wrote: >>> On 09/03/2013 12:25 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > I

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Norbert Hartl
Am 04.09.2013 um 10:54 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe : > > On 04 Sep 2013, at 10:47, Norbert Hartl wrote: > >> In all my other projects using zinc and RFB I didn't see the problem. But >> then I don't save images in production. > > Images are very cool and very useful, but saving images in

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
On 04 Sep 2013, at 10:47, Norbert Hartl wrote: > In all my other projects using zinc and RFB I didn't see the problem. But > then I don't save images in production. Images are very cool and very useful, but saving images in production is a no go, it is asking for trouble, IMHO. Sven

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Norbert Hartl
Am 04.09.2013 um 09:14 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe : > > On 04 Sep 2013, at 08:57, Marcus Denker wrote: > >> >> On Sep 4, 2013, at 12:42 AM, Paul DeBruicker wrote: >> >>> On 09/03/2013 12:25 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: If you do not give us more information we will never be able to f

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Norbert Hartl
Am 04.09.2013 um 01:13 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano : > > On Sep 4, 2013, at 12:42 AM, Paul DeBruicker wrote: > >> On 09/03/2013 12:25 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>> If you do not give us more information we will never be able to fix it. >>> And may be 3.0 will still have the problem and you wi

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Marcus Denker
On Sep 4, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >>> >>> >> We are in the process of fixing them, but have not fixed all yet. I always >> thought that we would >> back port when we have fixed the problem completely in 3.0 > > I'm not sure what we are seeing in pharo3 is the same problem r

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
On Sep 4, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Marcus Denker wrote: > > On Sep 4, 2013, at 12:42 AM, Paul DeBruicker wrote: > >> On 09/03/2013 12:25 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>> If you do not give us more information we will never be able to fix it. >>> And may be 3.0 will still have the problem and you wil

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
> Hi Stef, > > For reporting the RFB issue I made a thread > (http://forum.world.st/How-do-diagnose-image-locks-up-cpu-100-on-save-td4704639.html) > and uploaded a Pharo 2 image to dropbox where if you execute this code: > > > RFBServer start > Smalltalk snapshot: true andQuit: false > > > The

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo 2 problems that prevent me from using it in production was Re: RFB on 2.0 + linux - semaphore primitive failed

2013-09-04 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
On 04 Sep 2013, at 08:57, Marcus Denker wrote: > > On Sep 4, 2013, at 12:42 AM, Paul DeBruicker wrote: > >> On 09/03/2013 12:25 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >>> If you do not give us more information we will never be able to fix it. >>> And may be 3.0 will still have the problem and you will