Le 05/09/2014 08:43, p...@highoctane.be a écrit :
Yes there is that annoying thing with windows that set things bacl to
white. Why is that indeed?
It is Window theme to keep it consistant I guess
--
Dr. Geo - http://drgeo.eu
iStoa - http://istao.drgeo.eu
no smalltalk around is “smalltalk”, technically they are all dialects and Pharo
is just one dialect more.
smalltalk-80 itself does not exist since… well, smalltalk-80 :)
so no, your code would not be directly portable to other smalltalks (with the
possible exception of gemstone).
Esteban
On
Hi everyone!
When loading a package via Monticello, while compiling methods it gives an
error:
Syntax Error: Cannot store into and then a method.
What does it mean?
Best,
Mark
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Syntax-Error-Cannot-store-into-tp4776675.html
Sent from the
which package?
On 06 Sep 2014, at 10:28, Mark Rizun mri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone!
When loading a package via Monticello, while compiling methods it gives an
error:
Syntax Error: Cannot store into and then a method.
What does it mean?
Best,
Mark
--
View this message in
Package of my project RewriteTool.
Here it is:
http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~MarkRizun/RewriteTool/packages/RewriteTool
2014-09-06 11:33 GMT+03:00 Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com:
which package?
On 06 Sep 2014, at 10:28, Mark Rizun mri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone!
When
well, this is weird :)
the error you have is usually because you have something like this:
myMethod: aParameter
…
aParameter := something.
…
(same can happen with blocks).
you cannot assign a parameter… and compiler protests if you try.
but I wander how you could
You are right there is such a code.
And it's really strange how it compiled earlier:)
Thanks
2014-09-06 11:42 GMT+03:00 Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com:
well, this is weird :)
the error you have is usually because you have something like this:
myMethod: aParameter
…
aParameter :=
If you missed our discussion with Marcus, Opal allowed constructs like that
until week ago.
Uko
Sent from my iPhone
On 06 Sep 2014, at 10:46, Mark Rizun mri...@gmail.com wrote:
You are right there is such a code.
And it's really strange how it compiled earlier:)
Thanks
2014-09-06
Now that's not strange.
Thanks for info
2014-09-06 11:49 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Tymchuk yuriy.tymc...@me.com:
If you missed our discussion with Marcus, Opal allowed constructs like
that until week ago.
Uko
Sent from my iPhone
On 06 Sep 2014, at 10:46, Mark Rizun mri...@gmail.com wrote:
You
I don’t know what technical incompatibilities may exist, but for many
practicalities Pharo is compatible with Squeak and other dialects. I am using
an application (Todd Blanchard’s HTMCSS parser and validator) which was
originally written for Squeak. Some years ago I ported it to Dolphin
yes… 99% of the time Pharo and Squeak will be compatible.
we share the vm and a large part of the codebase.
but libraries are slowly diverging so you might find that what works in the one
does not works automatically in the other.
but again… my point is that all smalltalks are dialects… there
Hi,
i ran a program that did some calculations for about an hour. in between
i occasionally moved the cursor (so that the computer did not go to
sleep) and probably clicked occasionally on the browser. after some time
this resulted in several errors from the browser (the program itself
does
In my opinion, this dialect thing is getting increasingly silly. And
confusing. And silly.
2014-09-06 10:01 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com:
yes… 99% of the time Pharo and Squeak will be compatible.
we share the vm and a large part of the codebase.
but libraries are slowly
Werner Kassens wrote:
Hi,
i ran a program that did some calculations for about an hour. in
between i occasionally moved the cursor (so that the computer did not
go to sleep) and probably clicked occasionally on the browser. after
some time this resulted in several errors from the browser (the
Hi,
On 09/06/2014 03:35 PM, Ben Coman wrote:
Just to be clear, by did some calculations for an hour do you mean the
Image basically locked up during the calculation, and the mouse clicks
were queued until the calculation ended?
exactly, after the calculation different windows spring into the
In my opinion, this dialect thing is getting increasingly silly. And
confusing. And silly.
It is not getting. It was like that already back in 1998 and before too.
The syntax is one thing the libraries are another one!
BTW I opened last year a VW from 1994 and I do not want to live there :)
Werner Kassens wrote:
Hi,
On 09/06/2014 03:35 PM, Ben Coman wrote:
Just to be clear, by did some calculations for an hour do you mean the
Image basically locked up during the calculation, and the mouse clicks
were queued until the calculation ended?
exactly, after the calculation different
I'd like to learn a bit more about the implementation of Weak objects.
For example, I see...
MagnitudeLookupKeyAssociaton key: aKey value: anObject
key := aKey.
value := anObject
MagnitudeLookupKeyWeakValueAssociaton key: aKey value: anObject
key := aKey.
self value: anObject
Magnitude weakSubclass: #WeakKeyAssociation
instanceVariableNames: 'value'
classVariableNames: ''
category: 'Collections-Support'
weakSubclass: ...
On 06 Sep 2014, at 16:47, Ben Coman b...@openinworld.com wrote:
I'd like to learn a bit more about the implementation of
Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
Magnitude weakSubclass: #WeakKeyAssociation
instanceVariableNames: 'value'
classVariableNames: ''
category: 'Collections-Support'
weakSubclass: ...
Oh! the shame
Thanks Sven.
On 06 Sep 2014, at 16:47, Ben Coman b...@openinworld.com wrote:
Sorry, I can't tell across email if that stupid grin is
tongue-in-cheek since you know exactly what to do, or you are looking
for advice :)
Hi Ben,
i did not want to irritate you, i just thought perhaps i need to do some
sort of clean up with that fork thing afterwards (like deleting a
I find myself saying Pharo Smalltalk and Github marks our code as
Smalltalk.
Which is fine.
Pharo is Pharo indeed.
But the contents of the Blue Book still holds true.
What I do know is that I enjoy programming in Pharo more than with anything
else.
VisualWorks may have more power but I can't
Le 06/09/2014 16:36, stepharo a écrit :
In my opinion, this dialect thing is getting increasingly silly. And
confusing. And silly.
It is not getting. It was like that already back in 1998 and before too.
Yes. Who remember the differences between Envy / Parcplace / Digitalk /
Smalltalk-mt /
Werner Kassens wrote:
Sorry, I can't tell across email if that stupid grin is
tongue-in-cheek since you know exactly what to do, or you are looking
for advice :)
Hi Ben,
i did not want to irritate you, i just thought perhaps i need to do
some sort of clean up with that fork thing afterwards
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 06:09:15PM +0200, Thierry Goubier wrote:
Yes. Who remember the differences between Envy / Parcplace /
Digitalk / Smalltalk-mt / Smalltalk/X / Dolphin Smalltalk ?
I still play with Smalltalk/X. It is very different from Pharo, but it is an
implementation of Smalltalk
25 matches
Mail list logo
