Re: [Pharo-users] Timespan translateToUTC problematic

On 20 November 2017 at 08:30, Ben Coman wrote: > I don't ponder much on Dates, DateTimes etc, but I just had one interesting > image flash through my head > and was curious how correct it sounds, or if I'm completely off base. > > So who remembers the old arcade game "Moon

Re: [Pharo-users] Timespan translateToUTC problematic

On 20 November 2017 at 14:58, Alistair Grant wrote: > On 18 November 2017 at 18:38, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > > > > >> On 18 Nov 2017, at 17:46, Alistair Grant wrote: > >> > >> On 17 November 2017 at 14:44, Sven Van

Re: [Pharo-users] Timespan translateToUTC problematic

I don't ponder much on Dates, DateTimes etc, but I just had one interesting image flash through my head and was curious how correct it sounds, or if I'm completely off base. So who remembers the old arcade game "Moon Buggy" ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EptD9Egf7w Now imagine that passing

Re: [Pharo-users] Timespan translateToUTC problematic

On 18 November 2017 at 18:38, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > >> On 18 Nov 2017, at 17:46, Alistair Grant wrote: >> >> On 17 November 2017 at 14:44, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >>> Both interpretation are correct and valid, it is just hard to

Re: [Pharo-users] Timespan translateToUTC problematic

Richard, That is a very good explanation, and 100% correct. Dave On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:30:38PM +1300, Richard A. O'Keefe wrote: > I think the fundamental question is what a Date is supposed > to represent. I have spent a LOT of time thinking about date > and time classes over the last 10

Re: [Pharo-users] Timespan translateToUTC problematic

I think the fundamental question is what a Date is supposed to represent. I have spent a LOT of time thinking about date and time classes over the last 10 years, and have come to the conclusion that it makes no sense to view a Date as a Timespan. Let's take an example. Christmas this year is

Re: [Pharo-users] New Pharo article at The Cohort

I'm obviously missing a lot of the context here, but in my country (New Zealand) there is something called the Fair Trading Act. My understanding from reading the Commerce Commission web site is that - false or misleading representations about goods or services or the availability of goods

Re: [Pharo-users] Travis build failing because of bad CRC

So the fix is just to relaunch the build? :-) Julien > Le 19 nov. 2017 à 19:56, Cyril Ferlicot D. a écrit > : > > Le 19/11/2017 à 19:54, Julien a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> I’m trying to set up continuous integration for one of my project but I >> have an error with

Re: [Pharo-users] Travis build failing because of bad CRC

Le 19/11/2017 à 19:54, Julien a écrit : > Hello, > > I’m trying to set up continuous integration for one of my project but I > have an error with the CRC of the VM (see the > log https://travis-ci.org/juliendelplanque/PostgreSQLParser/jobs/304401690). > > Is it my fault? > Not your fault. It

[Pharo-users] Travis build failing because of bad CRC

Hello, I’m trying to set up continuous integration for one of my project but I have an error with the CRC of the VM (see the log https://travis-ci.org/juliendelplanque/PostgreSQLParser/jobs/304401690 ). Is it my fault?

Re: [Pharo-users] New Pharo article at The Cohort

Andrew, Thanks for sharing those articles. Is nice to see that Grafoscopio is showcased in the "little brother" story. I agreed that most of the processing could be happening on the edges of the network instead of in the Big Data centers (Cisco CEO thinks the same, which is not surprising). I

Re: [Pharo-users] Grease for Pharo7: TBehavior extensions?

2017-11-19 13:28 GMT+01:00 Johan Brichau : > Hi Pharoers, > > We have one failing test for Grease in Pharo7. > The reason is that Grease extends the TBehavior trait with a method > #fullName. > > I notice this trait is no longer used? Are we supposed to extend Behavior >

[Pharo-users] Grease for Pharo7: TBehavior extensions?

Hi Pharoers, We have one failing test for Grease in Pharo7. The reason is that Grease extends the TBehavior trait with a method #fullName. I notice this trait is no longer used? Are we supposed to extend Behavior directly? Overall: what are the plans? Some advice would be good so I can keep

Re: [Pharo-users] How to deploy headless app without changes and source files?

> On 19 Nov 2017, at 01:54, despotadesdibujau > wrote: > > I applied the solution of Sven over a minimal image of Pharo and it works! > I created a script to disable the calls to sources and changes and then I > deleted those. > The complete tutorial for use the