Hi,
Hopefully someone will do it soon, because we are just starting our
second week of "Visualizar 2018"[1] in Medialab Prado, a intesive two
weeks data visualization prototyping meeting and we'll iterate on our
Data Selfies project using Pharo, Grafoscopio and agile visualization[2]
and
Sounds like the user override is what we are after - I guess we need to make a
pr ... sadly my laptop has died so it’s not going to be me for a little while
until I can find an Apple store on my travels.
Tim
Sent from my iPhone
> On 2 Oct 2018, at 12:30, Ben Coman wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Mon,
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 00:10, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That is weird. It seems that you should have some debugging process
> running... Do you have the same error if you try again? So can also try
> with a squeak VM which is more simple.
> You can always retrieve your changes with Epicea (see Gif) and
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 23:16, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> Tim Mackinnon wrote
> > either by showing {owner}/{project}
>
> What about when there are multiple remotes?
>
+1 to what you imply here, that the owner/remote should not be auto-coded
into the project name.
Remote are well handled within
Dear all,
I have two questions regarding parsing frameworks.
1) Do you have any insights on the performance of SmaCC VS Xtreams Parsing
VS PetitParser?
2) Has anybody started to port PetitParser 2 from Pharo to VW? Is it worth
the effort?
Sorry for cross-posting, I thought this might
> Am 30.09.2018 um 13:01 schrieb Pierce Ng :
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 07:49:10PM +0200, Norbert Hartl wrote:
And a lot more. This is a coarse grained overview over the
architecture. I’m happy to answer further questions about this.
[very nice writeup]
>
> Hi Norbert,
>
>
NorbertHartl wrote
> finally I‘m asking everone to take care. I need to take care more about
> what I write. But people that get easily offended should see that is the
> other part of the problem.
Bravo. Request accepted :)
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
Sent from:
Tim Mackinnon wrote
> either by showing {owner}/{project}
What about when there are multiple remotes?
Tim Mackinnon wrote
> letting you give a better name in the definition to override what is
> shown?
We have project metadata now, so that seems straightforward. I have a few
use cases where
But this was really not against you Norbert, so really no apologies are
needed :), that's why I said that "I hope nobody thinks like that".
I should apologize for reacting in that case ^^.
The thing is that it can be frustrating to send an email and see that lots
of people focus on something
