Sounds like the user override is what we are after - I guess we need to make a
pr ... sadly my laptop has died so it’s not going to be me for a little while
until I can find an Apple store on my travels.
Tim
Sent from my iPhone
> On 2 Oct 2018, at 12:30, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 23:16, Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com> wrote:
>> Tim Mackinnon wrote
>> > either by showing {owner}/{project}
>>
>> What about when there are multiple remotes?
>
> +1 to what you imply here, that the owner/remote should not be auto-coded
> into the project name.
> Remote are well handled within Iceberg.
> The user though could add the owner as free text into a custom project name
> i.e. "owner-project"
>
> cheers -ben
>
