so 8. 2. 2020 v 23:33 odesílatel horrido napsal:
> So this forum is only for Pharo newcomers who have questions? Seems rather
> limiting.
>
> When I join other language forums, I look for information about the
> language
> I'm investigating as a newcomer. This can include the language's
>
Hi,
My hypothesis was closer to Erik's but I thought that being a JSON taken
from Wikimedia API, it should be correct. I didn't realize that I
converted it to STON to preserve line breaks and improve diff
friendliness. After using `STON fromString:` as advised by Peter,
everything worked well.
Self-promotion??? I generally dislike inserting myself personally into
Smalltalk advocacy. My campaign is all about Smalltalk; I'm just the
vehicle.
If you're referring to my comment "at the risk of sounding immodest," I am
rightfully proud of my video. It does a damn good job of promoting Pharo.
On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 05:50:18PM -0500, Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-users wrote:
> MAYBE we need another list...
Maybe Richard just needs to adjust the style of his mails...
> This is getting ridiculous! The guy spends energy, time, effort and is able
> to gather 13K in prizes and puts Pharo to
--- Begin Message ---
I guess I have to re-ask again since nobody answered my question from
this week...
Where can we post Pharo
questions/remarks/thoughts/you-might-want-to-have-a-look-at-this-cool-idea/whatever
(or anything that could be of any interest to Pharoers) ?
MAYBE we need
Hi Richard,
I’d like to invite you to refrain yourself from posting such off-topic messages
in the future.
This list is for people to *ask* questions about Pharo. Not to diffuse any kind
of propaganda (pharo related or not).
You’re not asking a question about Pharo, nor answering a question
So this forum is only for Pharo newcomers who have questions? Seems rather
limiting.
When I join other language forums, I look for information about the language
I'm investigating as a newcomer. This can include the language's
capabilities, limitations, real-world usage, new tools, philosophical
I've found this topic both interesting and upsetting at times. I do
understand the desire to address Pharo issues without getting sidetracked
by other topics.
However, this particular thread started as a Pharo user's success story.
Didn't it? Isn't Pharo the implementation used for the contest?
Hi Pharo friends,
TL;DR: How should one open a presenter on a user-specified model? Is
SpPresenterWithModel>>setAnnouncingObject: missing a call to modelChanged?
The long version:
I am trying to write a UI for my threat modeling tool using Spec in Pharo 8. I
had trouble getting my first
Hi Richard,
I’d like to invite you to refrain yourself from posting such off-topic messages
in the future.
This list is for people to *ask* questions about Pharo. Not to diffuse any kind
of propaganda (pharo related or not).
You’re not asking a question about Pharo, nor answering a question
Round 1 — #1 Leading Team: https://youtu.be/QWHeN5WXfBQ
I'm actually quite amazed by their effort. They surpassed my expectations.
At the risk of sounding immodest, I think this is a terrific way to promote
Smalltalk (Pharo). I think the video is an absolute blast.
Richard
Hi Ben
Maybe you misunderstood what I meant.
I was thinking of Pharo-backward-compatibility.
not Smalltalk-backward-compatibility
I am only suggesting that Pharo should be downward compatible
(that is, within Pharo's scope only).
meaning that everything built wit Pharo version X
should load
I agree completely. Pharo is a Smalltalk, but it need not be constrained by
Smalltalk-80. Pharo is completely free to chart its own course. As far as I
can tell, Nik Boyd's Hoot Smalltalk is doing the same thing.
This is purely a PR matter. Pharo's reputation doesn't want to be tarred
with
--- Begin Message ---
Smalltalk didn't "fail". We just didn't have the CPU power at the time
to achieve our dreams! And "Smalltalk is slow" was tagged forever
besides the name...
2020-02-08 07:17, Ben Coman wrote:The aim of the advertised statement
that Pharo-is-not-Smalltalk is to
avoid you
I am of the side of this argument that Pharo is a kind of Smalltalk,
but the group that forked Squeak to create Pharo did so with the
express intention of being separate-from-Smalltalk
and we should respect that intention. Indeed here we can see three
reasons why they feel the need to advertise
Hi,
Like Erik says the input is indeed illegal JSON. JSON strings are delimited
using double quotes not single quotes. There is no way around this, this is not
optional.
As Peter says, STON is more flexible. STON itself uses single quotes to be
closer to Smalltalk. STON in its JSON
Offray
I have a workaround, not an explanation. I don't use NeoJSON, because for me
the JSON facilities of STON are sufficient. So I tried you script with
'NeoJSONReader fromString:' replaced by 'STON fromString:' - everything worked
perfectly, no parsing error. So clearly there is nothing
Offray,
JSON only allows double quotes for strings, not single quotes.
Cheers,
Erik
--
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
18 matches
Mail list logo
