Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Linux with LibC version < 2.15

, 2017 16:20, "Andrew Glynn" <aglyn...@gmail.com> wrote: > There's a reason it's referred to by numerous developers as R-HELL. > > Andrew Glynn > > -Original Message- > > *Date*: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 21:46:20 +0800 > *Subject*: Re: [Pharo-users] Dep

Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Linux with LibC version < 2.15

Why use a special Pharo VM when you can use LibC via UFFI from inside the image ? UFFI even offers partial wrapper to LibC. We prefer afterall to move things outside the VM and inside the image as much as we can to offers us a greater deal of flexibility. On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 12:45 PM Cyril

Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Linux with LibC version < 2.15

Le 05/10/2017 à 15:46, Holger Freyther a écrit : > > Hi! > > > for a brief moment you really scared me. I thought you referred to RedHat > Linux 6 which was released in 1999 but you are referring to Red Hat > Enterprise Linux (RHEL). > > As it turns out we have "latest" (as soon as a commit

Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Linux with LibC version < 2.15

There's a reason it's referred to by numerous developers as R-HELL. Andrew Glynn -Original Message- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 21:46:20 +0800 Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Linux with LibC version < 2.15 To: bruce.on...@pckswarms.ch, Any question about pharo is welcome Re

Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Linux with LibC version < 2.15

RedHat < 7.0 still uses libc 2.12 as far as I'm aware. Pharo 5 has a downloadable version that works on that OS.  OEL with the UEK has an updated libc. Andrew Glynn openmastery.org -Original Message- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 11:43:07 +0200 Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Li

Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Linux with LibC version < 2.15

Le 05/10/2017 à 16:29, Holger Freyther a écrit : > I don't have a RHEL subscription but I assumed they are similar but > OBS even produces RHEL packages: > > https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/devel:/languages:/pharo:/stable/RHEL_6/ > > > Not sure. Even the RHEL documentation mentions

Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Linux with LibC version < 2.15

Any developer can get a free RHEL license and a dev account for accessing docs and what not. This includes CVE fixes etc. CentOS is close but not always the same. e.g. no security fixes are included vs RHEL when updating (even if the flag is accepted). I am going next week to the RedHat forum in

Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Linux with LibC version < 2.15

> On 5. Oct 2017, at 22:22, Cyril Ferlicot wrote: > > > Your instructions describes the steps for CentOS 6.x. Are they the > exact same steps for RHEL6? I don't have a RHEL subscription but I assumed they are similar but OBS even produces RHEL packages:

Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Linux with LibC version < 2.15

On 10/5/17, Holger Freyther wrote: > > Hi! > > > for a brief moment you really scared me. I thought you referred to RedHat > Linux 6 which was released in 1999 but you are referring to Red Hat > Enterprise Linux (RHEL). > > As it turns out we have "latest" (as soon as a commit

Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Linux with LibC version < 2.15

> On 5. Oct 2017, at 18:08, Bruce O'Neel wrote: > > Hi, Hi! > Well, our redhat 6.9 systems have 2.12, so, that qualifies. > > And yes, we still have RedHat 6, and 6.9 was released only 6 months ago! It > will finish extended support in a mind-blowing 7 more years

Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Linux with LibC version < 2.15

CentOS6.9 for one. Phil On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Holger Freyther wrote: > > > On 4. Oct 2017, at 17:39, Cyril Ferlicot > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am migrating some applications from Pharo 4 to Pharo 6. The new > > deployment of those

Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Linux with LibC version < 2.15

Hi, Well, our redhat 6.9 systems have 2.12, so, that qualifies. And yes, we still have RedHat 6, and 6.9 was released only 6 months ago!  It will finish extended support in a mind-blowing 7 more years in 2024. Redhat 5, still supported for another 3 years till 2020 has glibc 2.5.

Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Linux with LibC version < 2.15

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Holger Freyther wrote: > > > Which OS has such old versions of LibC? Which LSB standard does it support? > Hi, This is RedHat. I don't have the right to give more info than the fact it is a RedHat with a LibC version < 2.15. I don't know for

Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Linux with LibC version < 2.15

> On 4. Oct 2017, at 17:39, Cyril Ferlicot wrote: > > Hi, > > I am migrating some applications from Pharo 4 to Pharo 6. The new > deployment of those applications needs to work on linux with LibC < > 2.15. With Pharo 4 there was a special VM[1]. I do not see such VM

[Pharo-users] Deploying on Linux with LibC version < 2.15

Hi, I am migrating some applications from Pharo 4 to Pharo 6. The new deployment of those applications needs to work on linux with LibC < 2.15. With Pharo 4 there was a special VM[1]. I do not see such VM for Pharo 6. How should we manage those distributions? Thank you in advance. [1]