Re: [Pharo-users] Does RBImplementedButNotSent result in any critics for any of you?

Paul DeBruicker wrote > > Uko2 wrote >>> On 31 Jul 2015, at 16:00, Paul DeBruicker < >> pdebruic@ >> > wrote: >>> >>> It seems like its not testing for the right conditions any more and >>> therefore not finding any messages that are implemented but not sent. >>> >>> >>> I think this and t

Re: [Pharo-users] Does RBImplementedButNotSent result in any critics for any of you?

Uko2 wrote >> On 31 Jul 2015, at 16:00, Paul DeBruicker < > pdebruic@ > > wrote: >> >> It seems like its not testing for the right conditions any more and >> therefore not finding any messages that are implemented but not sent. >> >> >> I think this and the problem I was having the other da

Re: [Pharo-users] Does RBImplementedButNotSent result in any critics for any of you?

> On 31 Jul 2015, at 16:00, Paul DeBruicker wrote: > > It seems like its not testing for the right conditions any more and therefore > not finding any messages that are implemented but not sent. > > > I think this and the problem I was having the other day is from removing the > use of th

[Pharo-users] Does RBImplementedButNotSent result in any critics for any of you?

It seems like its not testing for the right conditions any more and therefore not finding any messages that are implemented but not sent. I think this and the problem I was having the other day is from removing the use of the RBSmallLintContext class from checking criitcs issues. Why did yo