Re: [Pharo-users] Is there a tonel:// format for repos?

2018-05-15 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
EstebanLM wrote > you cannot use vm “I” (for Itimer) with iceberg. I was guessing VM as well, or 64 bit, because those were the obvious differences between my setup and yours. The only part I found hard at all on Gitlab was loading other private projects from Gitlab, which require a bit of infrast

Re: [Pharo-users] Is there a tonel:// format for repos?

2018-05-15 Thread Cyril Ferlicot D.
Le 15/05/2018 à 14:45, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit : > you can safely ignore that warning in most cases (in fact, I was > thinking on removing it and replace for a small log or even nothing). > It would be great! Most of the time it just makes noise in the CI logs :( There is a PR to remove this

Re: [Pharo-users] Is there a tonel:// format for repos?

2018-05-15 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
you can safely ignore that warning in most cases (in fact, I was thinking on removing it and replace for a small log or even nothing). cheers, Esteban > On 15 May 2018, at 14:42, Tim Mackinnon wrote: > > Ah - well that would be one problem then - I was using that to avoid that > warning messa

Re: [Pharo-users] Is there a tonel:// format for repos?

2018-05-15 Thread Tim Mackinnon
Ah - well that would be one problem then - I was using that to avoid that warning message you get as I didn’t think I had privileges to do what it said - however it seems it would be better to have a proper docker container to run my CI builds in, and so I can probably solve it that way (the iTi

Re: [Pharo-users] Is there a tonel:// format for repos?

2018-05-15 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
hi Tim, you cannot use vm “I” (for Itimer) with iceberg. This timer will kill the SSH sockets. you need the “threaded” VM (which is the default, for obvious reasons :P). cheers, Esteban > On 15 May 2018, at 12:18, Tim Mackinnon wrote: > > Hi Guillermo - so here are the actual log files and t

Re: [Pharo-users] Is there a tonel:// format for repos?

2018-05-15 Thread Tim Mackinnon
Hi Guillermo - so here are the actual log files and the .st I’m running with build.sh (its a normal pharo command line execution). Its running on Ubuntu 17.10,  with Pharo 6.1 64 bit.I got Pharo like this:VM_STRATEGY="vmI61";curl http://get.pharo.org/64/$VM_STRATEGY | bash;curl get.pharo.org/64/61

Re: [Pharo-users] Is there a tonel:// format for repos?

2018-05-15 Thread Tim Mackinnon
Hi - I’ll extract the log files when I’m at my desk I can possibly make the pipeline public so you can better see it - and it’s a relatively simple app so maybe it can shed some light (although I’m still not ruling out my own stupidity yet). It’s a Pharo 6.1 64 bit image - download on build, ap

Re: [Pharo-users] Is there a tonel:// format for repos?

2018-05-14 Thread Guillermo Polito
Also, are you in Pharo6 or 7?

Re: [Pharo-users] Is there a tonel:// format for repos?

2018-05-14 Thread Guillermo Polito
Hey! On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:46 AM, Tim Mackinnon wrote: > I’ve created a new thread on Smalltalk CI - but back to tonel - having got > my local project to start reading - its now failing when it then starts > processing my BaselineOf and hits my willow dependency - which was > initially thin

Re: [Pharo-users] Is there a tonel:// format for repos?

2018-05-14 Thread Tim Mackinnon
I’ve created a new thread on Smalltalk CI - but back to tonel - having got my local project to start reading - its now failing when it then starts processing my BaselineOf and hits my willow dependency - which was initially things like: spec baseline: 'WillowBootstrap' with: [ spec

Re: [Pharo-users] Is there a tonel:// format for repos?

2018-05-14 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
Tim Mackinnon wrote > may take another look at SmalltalkCI - the trouble is, I really don’t like > Travis… I quite like the model of Gitlab’s one stop shop I use SmalltalkCI on Gitlab (https://gitlab.com/SeanDeNigris/gitlab-smalltalk-ci) - Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Ph

Re: [Pharo-users] Is there a tonel:// format for repos?

2018-05-14 Thread Tim Mackinnon
Peter - thanks for getting me to retry it - it turns out that tonel:// is correct, and I had misread the error message - which was actually due to me misnaming the baselineOf project suffix. To your point Sean - if using a CI server - if you use GitHub or GitLab:// prefixes - you need ssh key i

Re: [Pharo-users] Is there a tonel:// format for repos?

2018-05-14 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
Tim Mackinnon wrote > to just run a simple gitlab ci pipeline Can't you just use `gitlab://` and Iceberg/Metacello integration? IIUC it "just works" for tones, with or without Smalltalk CI (but I haven't ported to tonel yet, so take FWIW) - Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/P

Re: [Pharo-users] Is there a tonel:// format for repos?

2018-05-14 Thread Tim Mackinnon
Hmmm - will have to try that again - I seemed to get an error - maybe this is just a Pharo 7 thing? It had previously been simpler and more reliable to just run a simple gitlab ci pipeline - but yeah maybe I should reconsider that... > On 14 May 2018, at 16:59, Peter Uhnák wrote: > > Metacell

Re: [Pharo-users] Is there a tonel:// format for repos?

2018-05-14 Thread Peter Uhnák
> > Metacello new > baseline: 'WillowPagerDuty'; > repository: 'tonel://../src'; > load. > > This should work. You can also use SmalltalkCI instead of doing everything by hand. Peter

[Pharo-users] Is there a tonel:// format for repos?

2018-05-14 Thread Tim Mackinnon
Hi - I converted my project to tonel, and am looking to hook it up to my gitlab pipeline, and for older projects I had a run.st script that did: Metacello new baseline: 'WillowPagerDuty'; repository: ‘filetree://../src'; load. I get a not found error when I run that