On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 11:01 AM ducasse wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I would like to use STON to save objects that non programmer will edit.
> From that perspective I would like to be able to have a different class name
> than the one in the implementation.
>
> For example
> instead of
>
> 'SQOne{#question:
That is already provided, you should implement
SQOne class>>#stonName
^ #OneChoice
Apart from that I would also use STON class>>#toStringPretty: or #prettyPrint:
true on a writer, if the target audience are humans.
> On 20 Feb 2019, at 11:00, ducasse wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I would like to use
Hi
I would like to use STON to save objects that non programmer will edit.
From that perspective I would like to be able to have a different class name
than the one in the implementation.
For example
instead of
'SQOne{#question:''Where do developers typically write the Pharo
syntax?'',#cho
